Re: Adopters for m68k specific packages?

2008-07-18 Thread Michael Schmitz
Hi, > Sigh - seems like Christian and I are the logical suspects... [â?¦] > nvram and atari-fdisk may still be useful (what take have the > installer people on the latter?). Recent work on supporting Atari in the debian-installer was done by Stephen R. Marenka (CCed). I'm aware of Stephen's w

Processed: severity of 489861 is wishlist

2008-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34 > severity 489861 wishlist Bug#489861: QA page doesn't work for metapackages Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Re: RFS: xaos (updated package)

2008-07-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.4-1 > of package "xaos" (QA upload). The package was sponsored by Bernd: thanks! Sandro -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSU

Re: Adopters for m68k specific packages?

2008-07-18 Thread Brad Boyer
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:35:44PM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > nvsetenv (provided by nvram, IIRC) is used by quik-installer for > powermac-oldworld. Uploaders for the later are Colin Watson and Wouter > Verhelst. No, the nvsetenv program on powerpc is provided by the powerpc-utils package. This

Re: Adopters for m68k specific packages?

2008-07-18 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 05:36:08AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > >While I was going through the list of orphaned packages which > >have not a correct maintainer field yet (i.e. > >http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html) I noticed three fairly > >m68k specific packages are on the list: > > > >atari-fd

Re: Fwd: Bug#489861: QA page doesn't work for metapackages

2008-07-18 Thread Chris Walker
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 02:05:39PM +0100, Chris Walker wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Chris Walker wrote: > > > What I want is a way of keeping an eye on packages in one of these > > metapackages to see that they are at least vaguely up to date and not > > full of RC bugs. I was then going to ad

Re: Adopters for m68k specific packages?

2008-07-18 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 05:36:08AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Hi, > >> While I was going through the list of orphaned packages which >> have not a correct maintainer field yet (i.e. >> http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html) I noticed three fairly >> m68k specific packages are on the list: >> >> a

Re: Bug#489861: QA page doesn't work for metapackages

2008-07-18 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Chris Walker wrote: What I want is a way of keeping an eye on packages in one of these metapackages to see that they are at least vaguely up to date and not full of RC bugs. I was then going to add it to http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience in the hope that scientists will h

Re: Bug#489861: QA page doesn't work for metapackages

2008-07-18 Thread Chris Walker
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 08:43:33PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 09:09:47AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > >>science-physics on http://qa.debian.org/developer.php should do this, > > >>but it returns the page > > >>http: