Mika Tiainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 13 Jul 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> This package is useful for emacs21 users, as it's considerably newer
>> than what was included in emacs21. I agree that it's not useful for
>> emacs22 users (and indeed isn't installable if you only have emacs22
>> i
On 13 Jul 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Mika Tiainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I have not had any problems with No Gnus, but they are still
>> declared alpha versions, and maybe should be completely kept out of
>> stable. Both emacs and xemacs have the latest stable Gnus already
>> included.
Mika Tiainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: gnus
> Version: 5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
>
> This package should be orphaned, currently it has a two year old version
> of the gnus development series (No Gnus). If the package goes to lenny
> it should atleast have the latest No Gnus
Package: gnus
Version: 5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3
Severity: serious
This package should be orphaned, currently it has a two year old version of
the gnus development series (No Gnus). If the package goes to lenny it should
atleast have the latest No Gnus version.
I have not had any problems with No Gnus, bu
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:17:58 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#490683: qa.debian.org: package ktechlab has no new bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #490683,
regarding qa.debian.org: package ktechlab has no new bugs
to be marked as done.
This me
Georges Khaznadar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13/07/2008):
> Here are the two wrong assertions:
>
> 1- ktechlab (source, i386, alpha, amd64, arm, armel, hppa, ia64, mips,
>mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc) has new bugs!
>
> The link points to
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&da
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
the page http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ktechlab
states two wrong assertions, which I present below. Please take the time
to check the status of this package, and fix the wrong excuse items.
Here are the two wrong assertions:
1- ktechla
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:44:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: PTS: bug summary counts bugs that are assigned to two or
more packages more than once
has caused the Debian Bug report #457759,
regarding PTS: bug summary counts bugs that are assigned to
8 matches
Mail list logo
