esound [was: Re: Non-related 'Recommends' dependencies - bug or not?]

2008-06-15 Thread Martin Pitt
Frans Pop [2008-06-15 20:39 +0200]: > Also, the package has had uploads of new upstream versions to Ubuntu > without getting similar uploads in Debian, but even there not by its > Debian maintainer who AFAIK is an Canonical employee. esound should *so much* die completely. It has very poor soun

Re: Non-related 'Recommends' dependencies - bug or not?

2008-06-15 Thread Frans Pop
(d-qa CCed because of the status of esound; please CC me on replies) On Friday 13 June 2008, you wrote: > There are plenty of other examples. Here's a few of my favorites (look > up what packages depend on these libs yourself): > - libadns1 -> libadns1-bin (test tools/utils) > - libdjvulibre21 ->

Bug#479166: marked as done (qa.debian.org: [uninstallable] needs an explanation of what prevents installation)

2008-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:23:42 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 1902 has caused the Debian Bug report #479166, regarding qa.debian.org: [uninstallable] needs an explanation of what prevents installation to be marked as do

Bug#472432: marked as done (DDPO: the Uninstallable information lacks explanation and seems to be wrong/desynched)

2008-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:23:42 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 1902 has caused the Debian Bug report #472432, regarding DDPO: the Uninstallable information lacks explanation and seems to be wrong/desynched to be marked a

Bug#479166: marked as done (qa.debian.org: [uninstallable] needs an explanation of what prevents installation)

2008-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:23:42 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 1902 has caused the Debian Bug report #472432, regarding qa.debian.org: [uninstallable] needs an explanation of what prevents installation to be marked as do

Bug#472432: marked as done (DDPO: the Uninstallable information lacks explanation and seems to be wrong/desynched)

2008-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:23:42 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 1902 has caused the Debian Bug report #479166, regarding DDPO: the Uninstallable information lacks explanation and seems to be wrong/desynched to be marked a

Bug#486315: marked as done (PTS: resets bug counts)

2008-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:37:05 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#486315: PTS: resets bug counts has caused the Debian Bug report #486315, regarding PTS: resets bug counts to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#486305: marked as done (qa.debian.org: PTS subscription to package phpgroupware can't find it as source package)

2008-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:05:32 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#486305: qa.debian.org: PTS subscription to package phpgroupware can't find it as source package has caused the Debian Bug report #486305, regarding qa.debian.org: PTS subscription to pa

Bug#486315: PTS: resets bug counts

2008-06-15 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:23:51AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > > The bug counts for all packages in the PTS seem to be all-zeroes. My first > explanation for this is the current outage of a number of Debian machines. > However, I think it would be better if the PTS did

Bug#486315: PTS: resets bug counts

2008-06-15 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Package: qa.debian.org The bug counts for all packages in the PTS seem to be all-zeroes. My first explanation for this is the current outage of a number of Debian machines. However, I think it would be better if the PTS did not trash the old information it has before it knows it downloaded new fre