Hi,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Are some people interested? (I don't see any reason why they would need
> to be DDs)
As expected, I'm in (though I've already been working on it ;)
Cheers,
--
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Sounds good, please commit.
Done :).
>
> Also note that in packages-actions.txt, you must use REQ_RM(), not
> RM(), or just don't complain when the automatically-generated pages are
> not generated anymore :P
Oops, I got tricked by O(), sorry.
Cheers,
--
Atomo64 - R
Amaya wrote:
> I will post about findings in testing tomorrow.
Testing:
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=lenny&list=main%2donly%2drelationship%2dRecommends&arch=EVERY
(the ones in testing)
* poppler ghostscript
* printfilters-ppd lprng | lpr-ppd
* python-pysnmp4
Hi,
On Thursday 13 March 2008 23:00, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Therefore
> http://wnpp.debian.net/
> is no longer a HTTP redirect but
Great!
> Since the page has reached a "stable" state
> I would like to ask if there is a chance
> to point to it from somewhere on
> http://www.debian.or
Amaya wrote:
> I looked at every package listed in:
> http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=sid&list=main%2donly%2drelationship%2dRecommends&arch=EVERY
>
>
> And I came up with a summary of what packages in main recommed stuff not
> currently in main. I would welcome help in filing the bugs, an
Rationale:
http://release.debian.org/lenny/goals.txt
# No unmet recommends relations inside main
Advocate: Luk Claes
Description: Packages in main should be able to satisfy all recommend
relations in main.
Bug-User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug-Tag: goal-recommends
I looked at eve
Quoting James Westby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> For the geneweb part I am Ccing Christian. Christian, do you know of
> anybody that would be interested in the dag2html package? Would it
> be worth contacting your upstream?
I don't have any real idea of who could be interested in it.
However, on sho
This is a request for help with handling bugs from removed packages.
In the past, I closed these bugs with appropriate messages saying why
a package was removed. But after version tracking was introduced in
the BTS, simply closing the bugs wasn't appropriate anymore, I decided
to write a script to
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
[ For those who don't know about bapase: bapase is a set of scripts that
uses various metrics to detect packages that are good candidates for
orphaning or removal. After orphaning or removal is proposed, bapase
allows to track the process, so the orphaning/removal can o
Hi,
[ For those who don't know about bapase: bapase is a set of scripts that
uses various metrics to detect packages that are good candidates for
orphaning or removal. After orphaning or removal is proposed, bapase
allows to track the process, so the orphaning/removal can occur after
some time. ]
On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 11:14 +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:48 PM, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Is it even worth it? It's buggy, has a popcon of 12, and hasn't seen an
> > > upstream update since 2001?? My vote would be for removal.
> >
> > I agree, and
On 31/03/08 at 18:24 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After a short talk with Lucas I made some changes to bapase (not yet in the
> repository) which I'd like to get some feedback before committing them.
>
> The first set of changes (bapase_orphaned++.diff) is to score higher orphane
12 matches
Mail list logo
