On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:56:27PM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> -=| Frank Lichtenheld, Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 09:58:50PM +0100 |=-
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:17:31AM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> > > Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > >The whole OPTIMIZE stuff seems unneccessary, since this is an A
Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:25:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#468474: please add armel to debcheck
has caused the Debian Bug report #468474,
regarding please add armel to debcheck
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Hi,
I'd like to propose this GSOC project:
http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2008/UltimateDebianDatabase
However, I would prefer to share the mentoring with someone else, in
case I get too busy with other things at some point.
Is someone interested?
Also, is someone reading this list intereste
-=| Frank Lichtenheld, Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 09:58:50PM +0100 |=-
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:17:31AM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> > Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > >The whole OPTIMIZE stuff seems unneccessary, since this is an Arch: all
> > >package.
> > I thought so too but it's on the policy page
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
Can you please add armel debcheck now that armel is included in the
archive?
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?list=INDEX&package=&arch=&dist=sid
There might be other places at qa.d.o where armel is missing from, but
so far this is the only place I found.
5 matches
Mail list logo