Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, I do not really care about the _content_ of a homepage of the
> project. I care about the _existence_. The fact that there is _no_
> homepage or there _was_ a homepage and is not _anymore_ is IMHO an
> important piece of information that I want t
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Well, a third and fourth alternative would be to download the
documentation from archive.org, and (assuming you have the right for
distribution) but them in a -doc package or put it on
people.debian.o
On Feb 17, 2008 4:59 PM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm maintaining the package fastdnaml and wanted to move the Homepage
> information I putted into the long description formerly to the Homepage
> tag of the control file. When doing so I verified that the home page is
> correct b
Hello,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Well, a third and fourth alternative would be to download the
> documentation from archive.org, and (assuming you have the right for
> distribution) but them in a -doc package or put it on
> people.debian.org - in that case your might want to
Hi!
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080218 14:40]:
> Ahhh, just learned something new. ;-)
> I just tried it for the special case fastdnaml where I have to
> cope with the vanished homepage and noticed it in the copyright
> file. But I'm not fully convinced that this is a good general
> sol
Hi!
* Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080218 15:17]:
[ license.tcl ]
>> Oh, you remove it in debian/rules? Any reason for that?
> Gah, that's new. I ripped it out because lintian was complaining that
> it was an extra license file.
Ah, makes sense to remove it then, but a lintian overrid
Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Hi!
* Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080218 02:44]:
It includes a new upstream (fixes an RC bug)
Would have been nice to mention which bug ;)
Sorry, will do, next time.
and some significant re-packaging. It is also complaining about a
large /u
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
No, I meant archive.org (not .com as I wrote previously, sorry). They
archive web pages like a library (see for example
http://web.archive.org/web/19970502070835/http://www.debian.org/), and
maybe the have the documentation pages of your software ar
Hi!
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080218 07:59]:
>> If there was usefull content on it (e.g. documentation) you could
>> try to link to the specific page of archive.com; not the best solution,
>> but better than nothing I would say.
> You mean linking to http://packages.debian.org/sid/ if
Hi!
* Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080218 02:44]:
> It includes a new upstream (fixes an RC bug)
Would have been nice to mention which bug ;)
> and some significant re-packaging. It is also complaining about a
> large /usr/share, so I'm wondering if it should be split into a -data
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
