Formation
Gestion des Stocks et Inventaire
APPRENEZ À :
- Réconcilier les objectifs contradictoires des différents services de
l'entreprise
face à la gestion des stocks;
- Optimiser la gestion des stocks
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Well, I would say, that if only usefull purpouse of the homepage was to
download the tarball, than you can just drop the homepage header;
appearently the user has no nead for the tarball ;)
Well, you are right that there is no need to point to a pu
Hello,
Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> appears to be MIA, and most of
his packages have been NMU'd. You may want to consider orphaning them.
I have prepared an upload for gtkglext, so that one can be considered
under my maintainership "really soon now".
William
signature.asc
Descriptio
Hi folks,
Here is a QA Upload for tkgate.
It includes a new upstream (fixes an RC bug) and some significant
re-packaging. It is also complaining about a large /usr/share, so I'm
wondering if it should be split into a -data package or something? It
was installing everything under usr/lib/ pr
Hi!
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080217 21:10]:
>> AFAICT, it would seem that didiwiki is in this group as well. I found plenty
>> of links to it's nonexistant homepage. It's a frusterating situation, since
>> most users (myself included) expect to be able to go to the homepage and
>> fin
Your message dated Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:35:58 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fwd: [Dehs-devel] r111 - trunk
has caused the Debian Bug report #356826,
regarding PTS: could e-mail when DEHS detects new upstream release
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Jack T Mudge III wrote:
>
>> AFAICT, it would seem that didiwiki is in this group as well. I found
>> plenty of links to it's nonexistant homepage. It's a frusterating
>> situation, since most users (myself included) expect to be able to go to
>> the ho
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Jack T Mudge III wrote:
AFAICT, it would seem that didiwiki is in this group as well. I found plenty
of links to it's nonexistant homepage. It's a frusterating situation, since
most users (myself included) expect to be able to go to the homepage and
find out more about the p
On Saturday 16 February 2008 11:59:29 pm Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm maintaining the package fastdnaml and wanted to move the Homepage
> information I putted into the long description formerly to the Homepage
> tag of the control file. When doing so I verified that the home page is
> correc
On su, 2008-02-17 at 08:59 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> This would require a certain keyword because it would make no sense for
> the tools who build web pages from the control info to "not available"
> or something like that.
>
> What do you think about this?
I think it would make sense to use
Hi,
I'm maintaining the package fastdnaml and wanted to move the Homepage
information I putted into the long description formerly to the Homepage
tag of the control file. When doing so I verified that the home page is
correct but failed. The project seems to have vanished from the web.
I have t
11 matches
Mail list logo
