On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 02:17:19PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Note that this behaviour should be fixed. It happens that dak send several
> > Accepted mails during the same second for example when the package gets
> > out of NEW and when severa
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:13:56 +0100, "Frank S. Thomas" wrote:
> > If one bug is assigned to two or more binary packages of the same
> > source package, the PTS' "Bugs count" summary counts this bug more
> > than once. This summary should only count bu
Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:46:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line should not complain about ITPs of packages which are only in
experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:40:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line invalid, would induce a different meaning of "summary" than bts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:34:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line PTS: lingering new upstream version todo
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:13:56 +0100, "Frank S. Thomas" wrote:
> If one bug is assigned to two or more binary packages of the same
> source package, the PTS' "Bugs count" summary counts this bug more
> than once. This summary should only count bugs in the source package.
> The DDPO does this right, c
Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:05:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line qa.debian.org: Accurately represent Bugs/Patches available in
the Todo
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
On 26/01/2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:01:22PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2/libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3.dsc
> > Fairly intrusive but makes it build and fixes 2 important bugs.
>
> debdiff betwe
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:01:22PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2/libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3.dsc
> Fairly intrusive but makes it build and fixes 2 important bugs.
debdiff between the old and new binary:
File lists identical (a
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:37:17PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> New one one mentors.
Uploaded
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:57:12PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> I think I finally got it right. At least it display OK for me and
> lintian is happy now. I've put a new one on mentors.
Uploaded
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 02:17:19PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Note that this behaviour should be fixed. It happens that dak send several
> Accepted mails during the same second for example when the package gets
> out of NEW and when several upload happened while the package was sitting
> in NE
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 08:05:01PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > Moreover, and that's the main point of this report, it seems that the
> > last time the clash happened was January 2006, no other clashes in 2007
> > nor 2008. Is it possible tha
Hello,
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 21:07 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> It's been some time since DEHS[1] had some 'big' changes (probably since its
> creation). Here's a list of changes that have been done lately:
There's now a wiki page about DEHS.
http://wiki.debian.org/Dehs
Feel free to improve
OoO En cette fin de nuit blanche du samedi 26 janvier 2008, vers 05:23,
Seo Sanghyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> Therefore, I'd like to request to orphan this package. I would then
>> adopt it and maintain it inside Debian Python Modules Team.
>>
> You are right. I am sorry.
> Conside
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 11:06 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 06:46:32PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
> > Please don't show the Uploaders field when it is empty.
>
> I think in the beginning this was intentional (see the markup for the
> None string to convince yourself of this
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertag 462627 + pts
thanks
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 06:46:32PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
> Please don't show the Uploaders field when it is empty.
I think in the beginning this was intentional (see the markup for the
None string to convince yourself of this :-) ).
However no
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Please don't show the Uploaders field when it is empty.
Examples:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers.html
http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nsis.html
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 08:05:01PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Moreover, and that's the main point of this report, it seems that the
> last time the clash happened was January 2006, no other clashes in 2007
> nor 2008. Is it possible that the issue has been solved elsewhere and
> the clash n
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:47:50PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Hi !
>
> python-simpleparse has two annoying bugs:
> http://bugs.debian.org/426429
> http://bugs.debian.org/357537
>
> Both of them is solved by a new upstream version. The last upload by the
> maintainer is from 2005?[1]. Th
20 matches
Mail list logo
