RFS: Another QA Upload -- amavis-stats

Hi, Here is another QA upload. Mainly setting maintainer to QA and a couple of lintian fixes. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/amavis-stats/amavis-stats_0.1.12-9.dsc Thank you, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

RFS: QA Upload - grokking-the-gimp

Hi, Here is another orphaned package from the list. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/g/grokking-the-gimp/grokking-the-gimp_1.0-2.dsc Thank you, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: QA Uploads

Hi folks, Sorry for the cross-post but since these are QA uploads, I wasn't sure which list would be preferred. I have 4 packages from the Orphaned Packages with incorrect maintainer lists that I have put on mentors if someone has time to review/upload. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool

Bug#462470: PTS: don't show changelog-only ubuntu patches

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist I would like it if the PTS didn't link to changelog-only Ubuntu patches. Here is an example: http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/synfig.html http://patches.ubuntu.com/s/synfig/synfig_0.61.07-1build1.patch -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise sign

Processed: retitle 461047 to DDPO: qa.debian.org: For saving a few pixels...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13 > retitle 461047 DDPO: qa.debian.org: For saving a few pixels... Bug#461047: qa.debian.org: For saving a few pixels… Changed Bug title to `DDPO: qa.debian.org: For saving a few pixel

Bug#456276: marked as done (PTS: please link also to buildd logs for debian-ports)

Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:00:21 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line PTS: please link also to buildd logs for debian-ports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: retitle 412033 to extremely noisy when new package closes many bugs, reassign 412033 to debbugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13 > retitle 412033 extremely noisy when new package closes many bugs Bug#412033: PTS: extremely noisy when new package closes many bugs Changed Bug title to `extremely noisy when new pac

Bug#406615: marked as done (PTS: Please do not use experimental changelog)

Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:12:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line PTS: Please do not use experimental changelog has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#400480: marked as done (PTS page for pmidi is reporting wrong info about upstream release)

Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:39:19 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed (disabling rendering of out of date watch/uscan info) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#398192: marked as done (PTS: does not show security uploads anymore under news)

Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:23:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line PTS: does not show security uploads anymore under news has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: severity of 381275 is wishlist, tagging 381275

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13 > severity 381275 wishlist Bug#381275: PTS: add a notice if a removed source package is rebuilt as binary from another source Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > tags 381275 -

Processed: Re: Bug#381275: PTS: removed packages not considered when re-added to the archive

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # see below > retitle 381275 PTS: add a notice if a removed source package is rebuilt as > binary from another source Bug#381275: PTS: removed packages not considered when re-added to the archive Changed Bug title to `PTS: add a notice if a removed sou

Bug#381275: PTS: removed packages not considered when re-added to the archive

tags 381275 + moreinfo unreproducible thanks Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > it seems that removed packages are not considered again when they are > re-added to the archive, consider octave-plplot for example. Are you sure this bug is actually in effect? Or, read my question as: how can I reproduce it

Processed: Re: PTS: removed packages not considered when re-added to the archive

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 381275 + moreinfo unreproducible Bug#381275: PTS: removed packages not considered when re-added to the archive There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc