Hi,
On Mon Jan 21, 2008 at 20:36:19 +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Please use release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl instead of
> bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl, since the former is more "official" and
> more likely to be maintained since the release
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I asked about adding a new tag because summary is by default sent to
> the maintainer unless I've never really payed too much attention and
> the testing migration email is sent to both, the maintainer and the
> PTS.
That's the case: the testing mail
On 22/01/2008, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> >
> > This has been partially implemented in the DEHS backend, what's left now
> is to
> > make the backend store a list of upstream versions for which a
> notification
> > was sent and to mak
On 22/01/08 at 21:53 +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:13:01AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 22/01/08 at 08:13 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > But for me, ideally this should be filing bugs about new upstream versions
> > > not sending mails to the PTS because w
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:13:01AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 22/01/08 at 08:13 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > But for me, ideally this should be filing bugs about new upstream versions
> > not sending mails to the PTS because we really want to inform the
> > maintainer and not only the f
On 22/01/08 at 08:13 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > PTS could e-mail whenever DEHS detects a new upstream release of the
> > > package being monitored by a watch file. This would be particularly
> > > usefull in case where upstream packages don't
6 matches
Mail list logo
