Re: URL convention to point to per-package lintian checks

On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:27:41PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > So, question, what is the actual algorithm used by lintian.d.o to patch > > maintainer names? > > The script used to generate the html pages is available at: > http://svn.wolffelaar.nl/lintian/trunk/reporting/html_reports > > T

Re: URL convention to point to per-package lintian checks

On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 02:01:04PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > I'm also happy to change the lintian escaping algorithm to make it easier > for corner cases, but I'd rather not change the algorithm in a way that > would invalidate other external links unless we declare a major flag day Are you awa

Re: URL convention to point to per-package lintian checks

Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've already tried once to fix this problem and even submitted a patch, but > I recommend you to read the whole bug report[1]. > It would be great if you could finish my work on that. I'm also happy to change the lintian escaping algorithm to make it

Re: Summary of the MIA BoF during QA Extremadura 2007

On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 07:35:42PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > I would suggest: > > X-MIA-Summary: nice Then wait 15 days > X-MIA-Summary: just resend the nice mail in case it go lost Then > wait 15 days > X-MIA-Summary: prod Then wait 30 days > X-MIA-Summary: last

Re: URL convention to point to per-package lintian checks

Hello Stefano, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > This does not correspond to what lintian.debian.org is doing, partly for > the PTS bug, partly for (I guess, though I'm not sure) a lintian bug > which does not replace with "__" for the last character of maintainer > name. For example, at [2], if you

Re: Feature request for edos.debian.net

Hello, On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:44:05PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I'd like to know whether it would be feasible to have a symlink from > e.g. [1] pointing to the latest run, so that we can fetch the diffs > directly without having to parse the summary page [2] to get the > timestamp or th

URL convention to point to per-package lintian checks

Hi, I'm working a bit on the PTS these days, and I've just noticed that the current way used to point to per-package lintian checks from the PTS is not reliable. For example, if you look at the PTS page of amule [1] you can notice that the lintian URL is dangling. The current "algorithm" implement

Re: Summary of the MIA BoF during QA Extremadura 2007

Hi, On Saturday 01 December 2007 12:35, Mario Iseli wrote: > One point was defining fixed intervals of pinging a maintainer and how we > could automate them, my proposal would be the following: > > X-MIA-Summary: nice Then wait 30 days > X-MIA-Summary: prod Then wait 30 days >

Re: Mass bug filing: non-UTF8 debian/{control.changelog}

Hi all! I wrote last week: > I'm planning to file bugs for packages that use non-UTF-8 encodings in > debian/control and/or debian/copyright. > Fixing this is a release goal for Lenny [1], so the bugs will be filed > with severity important. They will be tracked by the "utf8-control" BTS > tag.