On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 01:12:48PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 03:01:07PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > This link is now there. I guess the problem is that that page is not
> > generated as often as the DDPO is updated.
>
> The pages are updated daily at 00:09 UTC, f
Your message dated Tue, 7 Aug 2007 00:39:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#436233: DDPO: please provide further info about the
"uninstallable" columns
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: dh-make
Version: 0.42
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Please include in the cron.d.ex file an [ -x ] test as already happens
for initscripts.
See these threads:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2007/08/msg0.html
http://lists.de
On 04/08/07 at 12:52 +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> > Lucas does some magic with his ruby scripts to merge old logs with new ones
> > and
> > does so mark new failures with NEWFAIL etc.. im not sure if they would work
> > with
> > your list, .. if you want to run this check on a regular basis
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
14:22 where does ddpo get the "uninstallable" data from?
14:31 ibid: iirc http://ftp-master/testing or something
15:00 Myon: i mean, it's showing dctrl-tools uninstallable in unstable
for many arches, and i don't understand why :)
15:03 the data is
http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=6850&d=20070806
Le Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:21:31PM +0200, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
> * Charles Plessy [Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:07:50 +0900]:
>
> > Strictly speaking, this paragraph asks about checking for programs, not
> > directories. Would this desserve a wishlist bug against the Policy ?
>
> Why would you want to
On Sunday 5 August 2007 15:06, Bluefuture wrote:
> Dehs data is fully updated now with new debian version conversion
> function.
> Please check result now and see if we can close this bug.
For the package I reported this for I can't check, because the watchfile is
outdated at the moment and I hav
* Charles Plessy [Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:07:50 +0900]:
> Strictly speaking, this paragraph asks about checking for programs, not
> directories. Would this desserve a wishlist bug against the Policy ?
Why would you want to check for directories instead of programs? The way
to check if a package is re
Le Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 11:46:08AM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi a écrit :
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 12:13:56AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 12:56:01PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > > Le Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 04:05:47PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi a écrit :
> > > > it seems tha
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 12:13:56AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 12:56:01PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Le Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 04:05:47PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi a écrit :
> > > it seems that emboss-explorer cron files are giving output when the
> > > package itself i
11 matches
Mail list logo
