On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 03:01:07PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> This link is now there. I guess the problem is that that page is not
> generated as often as the DDPO is updated.
The pages are updated daily at 00:09 UTC, fwiw.
> Anthony, would it be possible to generate that page when a new pa
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 02:57 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> I am afraid I disagree: a watch file inside a package cannot be updated
> without updating the package. That means watch files in packages in a
> stable Debian release are not going to get updated, they are there just
> to confuse people wi
On 8/6/07, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am afraid I disagree: a watch file inside a package cannot be updated
> without updating the package. That means watch files in packages in a
> stable Debian release are not going to get updated, they are there just
> to confuse people with
On su, 2007-08-05 at 18:34 -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> You mean, we shouldn't use watch files within packages? That's
> possible,
> of course, but it's the maintainers' job to inform QA or any other group
> of monkeys where future release should be fetched. The static package of
> course wil
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 15:14 +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> Could we do any action for let maintainers to adopt this watch file?
I'd suggest bug filling and NMUing if necessary. I volunteer for helping
on it.
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/
Respeto a Nicaragua y a la
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 20:32 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Could we, perhaps, instead do some action to have the watch files
> maintained somewhere centrally, instead of embedding information that
> will get outdated in packages?
>
> debian/copyright tells us where the code for the package was ret
Re: Adeodato Simó 2007-07-28 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Though I think it'd be reasonable, if possible, to have it appear in
> both. But this doesn't seem to be the issue at hand in this bug
> report, I realize.
As I said last year, all that is needed is a source for "Changed-By"
information (be it fro
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertags 435794 + pts ddpo
thanks
Re: Raphael Hertzog 2007-08-03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Adding reverse build-dependencies should be easy as everything is
> generated based on the "Sources" files.
Adding support for
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?packages=rev-dep:foo
a
On su, 2007-08-05 at 15:14 +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> Could we do any action for let maintainers to adopt this watch file?
Could we, perhaps, instead do some action to have the watch files
maintained somewhere centrally, instead of embedding information that
will get outdated in packages?
debian/
retitle 352661 RM: php4-tclink -- RoQA; orphaned, PHP4 about to be removed
reassign 352661 ftp.debian.org
thanks
Please remove php4-tclink:
* Orphaned for 18 months.
* RC-buggy due to the imminent removal of PHP4 (#418268).
* popcon: 25 installations, 0 votes.
Thanks,
Matej
--
To UNSUB
Hi,
here[1] there are 890 (see the last column in the table) automatically
generated and uscan checked watch file for packages that don't have
included one.
Naturally it needs a manual check before insert this watch file in
packages.
Could we do any action for let maintainers to adopt this watch fi
Dehs data is fully updated now with new debian version conversion
function.
Please check result now and see if we can close this bug.
Cheers,
Stefano
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:43:21AM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi a écrit :
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 12:13:56AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Crontabs have the same problem. They're in /etc, are often dpkg
> > conffiles, and cause some program to be executed. But the existence
> > of the program bin
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 12:13:56AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Crontabs have the same problem. They're in /etc, are often dpkg
> conffiles, and cause some program to be executed. But the existence
> of the program binary can't be guarnateed, so nonexistence should be
> handled cleanly and elega
14 matches
Mail list logo
