On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:20:56PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I don't object to QA pulling the current Homepage bits from the package
> description, but it would be nice if it could add support for Homepage as
> a control field at the same time. I'm happy to make a
This is reasonable and I don'
also sprach Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.17.2113 +0200]:
> > So this is a script to be run periodically?
>
> Yes.
I am beginning to like the idea less, though I understand the cause.
Since the PTS knows about maintainers and co-maintainers already,
anyway, and updates this inform
* Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070718 01:27]:
> I suppose one open question is whether to use Homepage or use Url, as some
> packages do already have Url headers and none are currently using
> Homepage. RPM uses URL.
URL seems to be better, but at the end, I don't mind.
Cheers,
Andi
--
* Stefano Zacchiroli ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070718 00:01]:
> I'm totally in favor of using a less broken standard for that, but we
> can easily start supporting the current state of the art, and then
> support both the current syntax and the new one.
I don't see any reason why not start supporting b
Wow thanks!!! Its wonderful now! :-)
Just a tought: summary could tell that ATM is used for notifications
of progression from unstable to testing, I find that particular option
interesting exactly because of that.
Thanks again!!!
Goodbye.
El 17/07/07 10:24, Debian Bug Tracking Sys
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:44:15AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:49:32PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Re: Pierre Habouzit 2007-07-17 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Please parse the Homepage: pseudo-header in the control's
> > > descriptions, and display it in the packa
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:49:32PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Pierre Habouzit 2007-07-17 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Please parse the Homepage: pseudo-header in the control's
> > descriptions, and display it in the packages summaries, as it's already
> > done with XS-Vcs-Browser.
>
> XS-* is
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Agreed, but fwiw I think that supporting "Homepage:" as requested in
> this bug report is even more justified than supporting Vcs-* (and notice
> that I actually proposed the latter). In fact 'Homepage' is a
> convention described in policy or devr
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Because we already have a documented convention for how a Homepage
> should be specified in a debian/control
No, we have a pseudo-standard that is not adhered to very well:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>apt-cache dumpavail |grep -i homepage: | sed 's/:.*//'|
sort | uniq -c | so
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > > id | fingerprint| uid
> > > --+--+--
> > > 5823 | F7867D1E8EEB8DE7EBBE05BF25D28CC5957D58CF | 1319
> > > 5900 | 86CB46D209591D06AE9C2A666CF485B3DCBA43DF |
> > >
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 02:57:36PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Why don't we just start using XS-Homepage similar to how people just
> started using XS-Vcs-Browser? Then maybe we can start putting this
> business of parsing the long description to bed.
Because we already have a documented convent
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:49:32PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Pierre Habouzit 2007-07-17 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Please parse the Homepage: pseudo-header in the control's
> > descriptions, and display it in the packages summaries, as it's already
> > done with XS-Vcs-Browser.
>
> XS-* is
* Russ Allbery [Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:57:36 -0700]:
> Why don't we just start using XS-Homepage
No objection to that, but the header should be XB-Homepage, or XSB at
most. (That is, it should appear in Packages.gz, and probably not in
Sources.gz.)
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 433469 + confirmed
Bug#433469: PTS: please parse 'Homepage:' pseudo-header in the Descriptions...
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
tags 433469 + confirmed
thanks
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:49:32PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> XS-* is a real field, just an "unofficial" one.
> Having said that, I don't oppose this proposal, I would just prefer a
> less ugly standard used first. (Why is there a space at the beginning
> of t
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Having said that, I don't oppose this proposal, I would just prefer a
> less ugly standard used first. (Why is there a space at the beginning of
> that line anyway?)
Why don't we just start using XS-Homepage similar to how people just
started using XS-
Re: Pierre Habouzit 2007-07-17 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Please parse the Homepage: pseudo-header in the control's
> descriptions, and display it in the packages summaries, as it's already
> done with XS-Vcs-Browser.
XS-* is a real field, just an "unofficial" one.
> An example of such a package i
Re: Raphael Hertzog 2007-07-17 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > id | uid | name
> > --++-
> > 1319 | thijs | Thijs Kinkhorst
> >
> > id | fingerprint| uid
> > --+--
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
> so get_tags() - bts - bts-control + contact --> set_tags().
>
> (just jotting it down for posterity)
>
> Now if we do it this way, then the changes to @packages.debian.org
> need to happen at the same time as the pts changes, or else some BTS
> mail w
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * martin f krafft [Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:17:18 +0200]:
>
> > Great, so I'll try to "clean up" the database then with a script,
> > which:
>
> > 1. iterates all packages and extracts sourcepkg:maintainer pairs
> > 2. checks whether maintainer is subscr
* martin f krafft [Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:17:18 +0200]:
> Great, so I'll try to "clean up" the database then with a script,
> which:
> 1. iterates all packages and extracts sourcepkg:maintainer pairs
> 2. checks whether maintainer is subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> a. if no, subscribe the
also sprach Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.17.1914 +0200]:
> > > 2. checks whether maintainer is subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > a. if no, subscribe the maintainer, thereby getting contact on
> > > by default.
> >
> > Yes.
>
> I spoke too fast, in fact not as si
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > 2. checks whether maintainer is subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > a. if no, subscribe the maintainer, thereby getting contact on
> > by default.
>
> Yes.
I spoke too fast, in fact not as simple as that. The default set of
keywords i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 433511 www.debian.org
Bug#433511: Fwd: Overview of ddd have dead links
Bug reassigned from package `qa.debian.org' to `www.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
reassign 433511 www.debian.org
thanks
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> I got this message from a user and verified it. The only thing unusual about
> ddd which might be causing this is that ddd-doc
> symlinks /usr/share/doc/ddd-doc -> /usr/share/doc/ddd (and depends on an
> equal
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
> 1. iterates all packages and extracts sourcepkg:maintainer pairs
The "Sources" files are already downloaded regularly as part of the web
interface. You might be able to simply read the data in
www/incoming/Sources_unstable_{main,contrib,non-free}.
>
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.17.1642
> +0200]:
> > The configuration has been lifted for the bounce handler. The
> > special header is still required for any non d.o machine. But it's
> > going to stay that way, s
Package: qa.debian.org
Tags: pts
I got this message from a user and verified it. The only thing unusual about
ddd which might be causing this is that ddd-doc
symlinks /usr/share/doc/ddd-doc -> /usr/share/doc/ddd (and depends on an
equal version of ddd as required by policy in this case).
reopen 380631
tags 380631 wontfix
thanks
also sprach Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.17.1642
+0200]:
> The configuration has been lifted for the bounce handler. The
> special header is still required for any non d.o machine. But it's
> going to stay that way, so there's no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 380631
Bug#380631: do not require approved header for emails to tags
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 380631 wontfix
Bug#380631: do not require approved header for emails to tags
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:38:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380631: Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
user debian-qa@lists.debian.org
usertag 391816 - pts
thanks
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote:
> Please replace links to buildd logs on
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=
> and http://packages.qa.debian.org/ with links to
> http://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg= or, even
also sprach Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.17.1559 +0200]:
> For the record, I created the contact keyword and everybody who had the
> "default" keyword already has the new "contact" keyword. The new keyword
> is also activated by default (if you don't customize the set of keywords
>
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.08.1426 +0200]:
> > I can easily create the "contact" keyword but someone needs to write a
> > script which does the auto-subscription of maintainers to the PTS. And of
> > course afterwards the [
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:19:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430143: pts.cgi: use tooltips to explain what the
different checkboxes mean.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Please parse the Homepage: pseudo-header in the control's
descriptions, and display it in the packages summaries, as it's already
done with XS-Vcs-Browser.
An example of such a package is nsd3, note that packages.d.o has it
right: http://packages.debi
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.17.0058 +0200]:
> > The script needs to run with write access to the database so you're not
> > going to run it by yourself on the real installation anyway. :)
>
> I was going to simply use the m
also sprach Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.17.0058 +0200]:
> The script needs to run with write access to the database so you're not
> going to run it by yourself on the real installation anyway. :)
I was going to simply use the mail interface, but I guess that
requires confirmation
38 matches
Mail list logo
