Bug#420819: marked as done (debcheck needs to be adjusted to m68k removal)

Your message dated Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:20:28 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#420819: debcheck needs to be adjusted to m68k removal has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#420819: debcheck needs to be adjusted to m68k removal

Package: qa.debian.org Subject says it all. m68k's absence distorts various statistics, for instance: http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=etch&list=main-only-build%2ddepends&arch=ANY -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT

Re: Build-Depends and virtual packages

On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 05:34:20PM +0100, Regis Boudin wrote: > On Tue, April 24, 2007 15:42, Steve Langasek wrote: > >> I have results I will put online as soon as I convert them in a better > >> format than a simple text list, but if you have comments on what to do > >> with this list, they are m

Re: Outdated text on http://qa.debian.org/

Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > Hi, > > Text on http://qa.debian.org/ states > > "The Debian Project is currently working on a release of the next version, > codenamed etch." > > which is slightly outdated :) I have updated the pages (even correcting a typo in a variable that was used all over the pla

Bug#373218: Info received (Bug#373218 closed by Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (closing 373218))

Hi again as I have some time, I wanted to create patch for this issue. However I'm don't know XSL which is being used for generating PTS page. Fixing for some more names can be done by adding selected special chars to replace string, but this will again sometimes end on some name with different sp

Re: qa.debian.org: 0 man pages in 0 packages missing

Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyway, the current problem is caused because > http://lintian.debian.org/lintian.log gives you "403: Forbidden". I'm > CCing Russ who can hopefully fix this. Thanks, this should be fixed now. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: qa.debian.org: 0 man pages in 0 packages missing

* Edlira Nano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-24 12:08]: > Since Sunday 22 april, http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html reports > "In total 0 man pages in 0 packages are missing at the moment." But the > Lintian report is not agreeing :) > > Maybe it is the same kind of problem with another page you "m

Bug#373218: (no subject)

Hi, sorry for closing this I mixed this exactly because there is a working link on your developer page :) I looked into the PTS page and the site which includes Lintian is just a .xsl file. On ddpo php is used to encode the url and strip these %xx character from the url. Is there any way to get

Re: Build-Depends and virtual packages

On Tue, April 24, 2007 15:42, Steve Langasek wrote: >> I have results I will put online as soon as I convert them in a better >> format than a simple text list, but if you have comments on what to do >> with this list, they are more than welcome. > > In the general case: nothing. It is *not* corre

Bug#373218: closed by Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (closing 373218)

reopen 373218 thanks Hi this issue IMHO still exists. On PTS[1] there is link to page with all accents[2] which does not exist, while on DDPO[3] Lintian link points to existing page[4]. [1]:http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mpdscribble.html [2]:http://lintian.debian.org/reports/mMichal_%C4%8Ciha%C

Processed: Re: Bug#373218 closed by Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (closing 373218)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 373218 Bug#373218: PTS: wrong link to lintian page Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database

Bug#373218: marked as done (PTS: wrong link to lintian page)

Your message dated Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:59:21 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing 373218 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r

Re: Build-Depends and virtual packages

On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 02:57:40PM +0100, Regis Boudin wrote: > Over the last few days, I've been looking at Build-Depends and > Build-Depends-Indep fields. My original aim was something like trying to > have a build path to rebuild the complete archive, with only a Sources > file as starting data

Build-Depends and virtual packages

Hi all, Over the last few days, I've been looking at Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep fields. My original aim was something like trying to have a build path to rebuild the complete archive, with only a Sources file as starting data (basically, src:foo build-depends on libbar-dev in the "Binar