On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:59:59PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I'm more worried about how you choose the environment you want to
> dist-upgrade. Various criteria that come to my mind (braindump):
> - base system only (pro: easy to set up, cons: tests a too small set of
> package)
> - \fora
[opening a new thread, since it was the original idea]
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:59:59PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I'm more worried about how you choose the environment you want to
> dist-upgrade. Various criteria that come to my mind (braindump):
> - base system only (pro: easy to set u
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:27:54PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> how about testing automatic dist-upgrades like stable->testing?
I love this idea: as a maintainer is quite a burden to take care of
this, a massive testing effort would help a lot of DDs out there!
> of course this is not trivia
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:41:25AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Well, what I'm looking for is:
>
> [A] People with good ideas of tests that would improve Debian's
> quality, or Free Software's quality in general
>
> [B] People willing to help with providing code for the tests, and
> pro
4 matches
Mail list logo
