Quoting Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Would it be possible to add debian-qa mailing list to gmane?
>
> It's there already: gmane.linux.debian.devel.quality-assurance.
>
Oh! how did I miss that! I think I was just searching for qa
Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would it be possible to add debian-qa mailing list to gmane?
It's there already: gmane.linux.debian.devel.quality-assurance.
You can use http://gmane.org/find.php to find lists on Gmane.
Cheers,
--
,''`.
: :' :Romain Francoise <[EMA
polls show that a clear majority of Americans see the war as a mistake and far
fewer
Critical Care Inc,
symbl: .CTCX.
This one is an easy doubler
@ 65 cents wont last long
Expected target : $ 3.00
Critical Care Announces Expansion of Cost Containment Activities
Business Wire (Fri, Feb 16)
Would it be possible to add debian-qa mailing list to gmane? debian-users is
already there. A quick look at gmane (http://gmane.org/subscribe.php) tells me
that it should be possible. Just wanted to check here if there is any reason
not to add it to gmane. If someone else (who is more knowledgea
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 20:27 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 19:12 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > The format - amongst other potentially useful removal related stuff
> > - is
> > documented in http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals (if there's
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 19:12 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> The format - amongst other potentially useful removal related stuff -
> is
> documented in http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals (if there's
> anything that's missing, feel free to prod me...)
May I
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:05:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#412635: qa.debian.org: PTS could show removal requests
based on bugs against ftp.debian.org
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Just one thought: Why not test "-Wl,--as-needed" too? It should greatly
> reduce the number of dependencies for most packages without the tedious
> and error-prone task to re-libtoolize the package for every new release.
--as-needed would also be a t
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 22:03 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> The Package Tracking System could show removal requests for a package,
>> based on bug reports against ftp.debian.org.
>
> It already does:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/v/vimacs.html
> http://packages.qa.debian
Just one thought: Why not test "-Wl,--as-needed" too? It should greatly
reduce the number of dependencies for most packages without the tedious
and error-prone task to re-libtoolize the package for every new release.
I'd also like to know how many percent of our packages which could be
re-libtooli
Hi there,
(We had a small exchange via private email with Lucas and he suggested
we continue the discussion on debian-qa@, hence full text included
below.)
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 24/02/07 at 16:34 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been r
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 22:03 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> The Package Tracking System could show removal requests for a package,
> based on bug reports against ftp.debian.org.
It already does:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/v/vimacs.html
http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/satutils.html
http://pa
12 matches
Mail list logo
