Bug#412033: PTS: extremely noisy when new package closes many bugs

On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, era eriksson wrote: > Any chance then you could call that category "bts-dak" or something, and > at least make it something one could opt out from separately from the > other stuff? Perhaps the dak maintainer could cooperate to make this > less painful to code? I don't want to

Bug#412033: PTS: extremely noisy when new package closes many bugs

On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:33:59 +0100, "Raphael Hertzog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Christoph Berg wrote: > > > keyword you won't receive discussions concerning bug reports. > > > > I agree that the "done" mails from the BTS are quite boring as they > > only repeat the initial m

Bug#412033: PTS: extremely noisy when new package closes many bugs

On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Christoph Berg wrote: > > keyword you won't receive discussions concerning bug reports. > > I agree that the "done" mails from the BTS are quite boring as they > only repeat the initial mail. That's because most of the -done mails are generated by dak. But there are also manu

Re: PTS subscriptions unclear

Hello, On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Let's take package feed2imap, for which I'm the maintainer. I think I > receive a mail when the testing status changes (new version gets into > testing). > > But why I am receiving it ? I'm not subscribed to feed2imap in the PTS. That's because

PTS subscriptions unclear

Hi, I must admit that I don't really understand how PTS subscriptions work. Let's take package feed2imap, for which I'm the maintainer. I think I receive a mail when the testing status changes (new version gets into testing). But why I am receiving it ? I'm not subscribed to feed2imap in the PTS

Bug#412033: PTS: extremely noisy when new package closes many bugs

Re: Raphael Hertzog 2007-02-23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > If > > > > tries to explain how to fix this if you don't like the defaults, then I > > don't understand it, and in any event, does the current d

Bug#393462: marked as done (PTS: please make VCS link also point to browsable copy)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:53:10 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393462: PTS: please make VCS link also point to browsable copy has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Bug#412033: PTS: extremely noisy when new package closes many bugs

On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, era eriksson wrote: > Guess twice how many copies of the following message I have received? > > From: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Bug#xx: marked as done (bug title) > > I can understand the motivati