Re: Packages still linked against libstdc++5 in unstable

2007-01-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 09:53:15AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 03:06:29AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > The following packages are still linked against libstdc++5 in unstable. > > vncsnapshot > I have some minor changes queued up that I thought were not really

Re: Packages still linked against libstdc++5 in unstable

2007-01-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 03:06:29AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > The following packages are still linked against libstdc++5 in unstable. > This isn't so great, since it means people using these packages have to carry > around an extra library. It also means that the packages haven't been > re

Bug#406847: DDPO: link to p-u-new is stale

2007-01-14 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Package: qa.debian.org Hi, On my DDPO, http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=thijs, the package 'mantis' is listed under Pending uploads with the following versions under stable: 0.19.2-5sarge4.1 p-u-new: 0.19.2-5sarge2.1 When I click the link that p-u-new is, there's no such package listed.

Bug#354307: http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xpenguins-applet.html affected, too

2007-01-14 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Package: qa.debian.org Followup-For: Bug #354307 FWIW just a "me too". -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-k7 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF

Re: Packages still linked against libstdc++5 in unstable

2007-01-14 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 03:06:29AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > The following packages are still linked against libstdc++5 in unstable. > > vncsnapshot > I have some minor changes queued up that I thought were not really worth an upload. However, given this, I can prepare a new upload tomor

Re: Packages still linked against libstdc++5 in unstable

2007-01-14 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > > postal > > Same maintainer as logtools, maildir-bulletin, but only a few users. postal is the kind of thing you install to commission or load-test a mail system and then remove. It is extremely useful, but it is expected to have just a few u

Re: Packages still linked against libstdc++5 in unstable

2007-01-14 Thread Steffen Joeris
Hi Thanks Marc for the nice summary, helps me a bit :) > So, it looks like juice, maildir-bulletin, qe, qmc, shaperd and > tigr-glimmer are easy removals. Anyone interested to mail the respective > maintainers? Yes I am on it and pinging appropriate candidates. Cheers Steffen pgpRshRliBMH5.pgp

Re: Packages still linked against libstdc++5 in unstable

2007-01-14 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > jabber-jit Still some users. > juice Almost no users, maintainer seems to be MIA. > kimwitu++ Maintainer is still alive, but the package has like *no* users. > launchtool Maintainer is very alive, but the package isn't really used. > le Still

Packages still linked against libstdc++5 in unstable

2007-01-14 Thread Nathanael Nerode
The following packages are still linked against libstdc++5 in unstable. This isn't so great, since it means people using these packages have to carry around an extra library. It also means that the packages haven't been recompiled or uploaded in a *long* time. I'd like to ask -release to schedu