Re: Shouldn't gs-afpl be removed instead of orphaned?

On Fri, Oct 20, 2006, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Hi, > > shoudn't gs-apfl be removed if it's superseeded by free software as per > your statement in the bug report? I agree with you, even if there are many users of gs-apfl. This package has many bugs and there are better alternatives in Debian. C

Processed: Re: Bug#399186: Debian Package Tracking System: changelog links not working

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 399186 www.debian.org Bug#399186: Debian Package Tracking System: changelog links not working Bug reassigned from package `qa.debian.org' to `www.debian.org'. > merge 399186 399236 Bug#399186: Debian Package Tracking System: changelog links no

Bug#399186: Debian Package Tracking System: changelog links not working

reassign 399186 www.debian.org merge 399186 399236 thanks Hi Holger, The broken links point at files under http://packages.debian.org ; I think that server is maintained by the debian-www group. Reassigning to the www.debian.org pseudo-package and merging with the other bug that I filed about th

Bug#399186: Debian Package Tracking System: changelog links not working

Package: qa.debian.org Hi, I just mentioned that for several packages (if not all?) the changelog link on the package site does not work. Example: http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/boa.html Then press the Changelog link under "Other links" on the left: "The requested URL /changelogs/pool/main/