Re: ndtpd: Better remove?

2006-10-06 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 15:48 +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Sound like a removal candidate. Are there any packages in Debian that > offer similar functionality? Not really, but there's two clients for the same protocol in Debian which have even lower popcon numbers. A websearch for the implemented

Re: Let's remove odontolinux

2006-10-06 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
hi, On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 04:15:13PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Combined, I don't think fixing the RC bug(s) is worth the effort for the > package in its current state. > > Any objections to removal? no, please go ahead. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Let's remove odontolinux

2006-10-06 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hello all, > even pulling in the postgresql-client build-dep does not help much (the > database handling is quite hacky, for example it always assumes postgres > to run on localhost etc. etc.). The package should be updated to use > something like `dbconfig-common' for setting up its database. o

Re: ndtpd: Better remove?

2006-10-06 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Thijs! You wrote: > I've taken a look at this package and I think removal might be > preferable over fixing the RC bug, for the following reasons: > * Of course, this RC bug; > * There's more to the RC bug than just the error on purge > (see comment Jaakko) and there's more unresolved bugs,

ndtpd: Better remove?

2006-10-06 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hello, > > The postrm script cannot rely on sysklogd to be available when > > purging. > I took a look at the bug and preinst, and got the feeling > that there's too much mucking around with this syslog stuff. I've taken a look at this package and I think removal might be preferable over fixin

Re: Bug#391359: general: packages.debian.org package view could have a link to see the source changelog.

2006-10-06 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
reassign 391359 www.debian.org thanks On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 12:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > packages.debian.org bugs don't belong to "general". Reassigning. Thanks for your work, but the right pseudo-package is www.debian.org. Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: Bug#391359: general: packages.debian.org package view could have a link to see the source changelog.

2006-10-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
reassign 391359 qa.debian.org thanks On Friday, October 06, 2006 9:51 AM, Raúl Sánchez Siles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: general > Severity: wishlist > > With aptitude changelog is quite easy to know the latest modifications > of a package, but it quite often refers to new upstream re