Re: Update on orphaned packages with very low popcon numbers

2006-09-10 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > malaga: 16 (5 votes) Please note from #369161 that there is someone who might be willing to maintain malaga if asked, under sponsorship. > manpages-fi: 14 > manpages-ko: 16 Dropping these is really not an option; Debian is committed to internationa

Re: Help transition to gettext 0.15

2006-09-10 Thread Damián Viano
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 10:28:31PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > Hi, > > gettext 0.15 causes several FTBFS, for different reasons. In > order to find all problems and to provide fixes, it would help > to know which packages FTBFS, with build logs. Could someone > rebuild all packages which Build

Re: Help transition to gettext 0.15

2006-09-10 Thread James Westby
On (10/09/06 22:28), Denis Barbier wrote: > Hi, > > gettext 0.15 causes several FTBFS, for different reasons. In > order to find all problems and to provide fixes, it would help > to know which packages FTBFS, with build logs. Could someone > rebuild all packages which Build-Depends{,-Indep}: ge

Help transition to gettext 0.15

2006-09-10 Thread Denis Barbier
Hi, gettext 0.15 causes several FTBFS, for different reasons. In order to find all problems and to provide fixes, it would help to know which packages FTBFS, with build logs. Could someone rebuild all packages which Build-Depends{,-Indep}: gettext? I have no hardware to do this myself. Thanks i

Re: QA packages with really high popcon numbers :-)

2006-09-10 Thread Russ Allbery
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > metamail: 1738. This package should not be adopted. Instead, all of the packages that depend on it should be modified to use other packages such as mime-construct or mimedecode (also orphaned) and it should be removed. It's been abandoned upstream a

Re: QA packages with really high popcon numbers :-)

2006-09-10 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 05:58:31AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Please feel free to forward this/advertise this to any places where it might > inspire > people to adopt these packages. Hmm, maybe I'll adopt some of the fonts -- > they're > pretty easy to maintain. I think this deserves to b

Re: QA packages with really high popcon numbers :-)

2006-09-10 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le dim 10 septembre 2006 11:58, Nathanael Nerode a écrit : > python-gnome: 1000. that one is obsolete afaict, and is superseeded by python-gnome2. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp:/

QA packages with really high popcon numbers :-)

2006-09-10 Thread Nathanael Nerode
In other words, packages which some prospective developer would probably earn lots of brownie points by adopting. :-) With 15971 popcon installs for base-passwd, I figured 5% of the total was a pretty high value. That is, 800 or more installs. (Incidentally, I wonder who installed base-passwd

Update on orphaned packages with very low popcon numbers

2006-09-10 Thread Nathanael Nerode
This is an update on http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/08/msg00115.html. Some have been ITAed or adopted and are removed from the list. :-) Others have been removed from Debian or removal requests filed (some by me) and are likewise removed from the list. :-) eco5000: 10 hanterm-xf: 17 (5