Re: RM: arla -- RoQA; orphaned, RC-buggy, OpenAFS is an alternative

2006-08-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > retitle 358482 RM: arla -- RoQA; orphaned, RC-buggy, OpenAFS is an alternative > reassign 358482 ftp.debian.org > thanks > I think we should remove arla. > * Orphaned for 5 months. > * 5 RC bugs, 16 bugs total. > * openafs-client et al. provide equi

RM: zmailer -- RoQA; orphaned, RC-buggy

2006-08-19 Thread Matej Vela
retitle 373908 RM: zmailer -- RoQA; orphaned, RC-buggy reassign 373908 ftp.debian.org thanks I think we should remove zmailer. * Orphaned for 2 months. * 4 RC bugs, 18 bugs total. * Did not ship with sarge. * Already removed from testing. * popcon: 7 installs, 7 votes. Thanks, Matej

RM: arla -- RoQA; orphaned, RC-buggy, OpenAFS is an alternative

2006-08-19 Thread Matej Vela
retitle 358482 RM: arla -- RoQA; orphaned, RC-buggy, OpenAFS is an alternative reassign 358482 ftp.debian.org thanks I think we should remove arla. * Orphaned for 5 months. * 5 RC bugs, 16 bugs total. * openafs-client et al. provide equivalent functionality; most of the differences seem

RM: x-symbol -- RoQA; orphaned, RC-buggy, inactive upstream

2006-08-19 Thread Matej Vela
retitle 348060 RM: x-symbol -- RoQA; orphaned, RC-buggy, inactive upstream reassign 348060 ftp.debian.org thanks I think we should remove x-symbol. * Orphaned for 7 months. * 1 RC bug, 20 bugs total. * Last upload in 2002. * Last upstream release on May 12, 2003:

RM: kernel-patch-2.4-supermount-ng -- RoQA; orphaned, out of date

2006-08-19 Thread Matej Vela
retitle 298998 RM: kernel-patch-2.4-supermount-ng -- RoQA; orphaned, out of date reassign 298998 ftp.debian.org thanks I think we should remove kernel-patch-2.4-supermount-ng. * Orphaned for 17 months. * Doesn't apply to any of the kernels currently in sid (though with minor changes it co

Re: Packages that might need to be orphaned

2006-08-19 Thread Davide Puricelli
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:05:49PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > Davide Puricelli evo > > doc-linux-it 2004-01-19 2006-07-13 Yes > > Out of date documentation sucks. This package should be removed. You're right, outdated documentation sucks, but I want to update it before the end