Re: Packages that might need to be orphaned

On Thu, Aug 17, 2006, Amaya wrote: > Jeff Bailey jbailey > diffmon 2002-02-26 2006-07-12 No. Last M Upload is > the only upload I've pinged him yesterday about diffmon. -- adn Mohammed Adnène Trojette -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Packages that might need to be orphaned

* Disclaimer: I suck at ascii-art * After a series of (loving) NMUs in January (xlibs-dev transition) and July (/usr/doc transition), I came acrross a long list of packages whose maintainers didn't ack the NMU, respond, care. I have come up with a list of packages that could be orphaned (

Re: Can fidogate be removed?

reassign 374520 ftp.debian.org retitle 374520 RM: fidogate -- RoQA; security-buggy, RC-buggy, orphaned, very few users thanks On Thu, Aug 17, 2006, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 03:12:06PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > fidogate: > > * Has had a security issue reported; >

Re: Can fidogate be removed?

On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 03:12:06PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > fidogate: > * Has had a security issue reported; > * Has a number of policy violations; > * Has been orphaned for two months; > * Has 4 popcon installs with 1 vote; > * Is a couple of versions behind upstream; > * Is a gateway for F

Can fidogate be removed?

Hello all, fidogate: * Has had a security issue reported; * Has a number of policy violations; * Has been orphaned for two months; * Has 4 popcon installs with 1 vote; * Is a couple of versions behind upstream; * Is a gateway for Fidonet, does that even exist anymore nowadays? In my opinion, we'd