Re: gpdf: remove? security hole open for this long?

2006-07-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-21 23:49]: > I think having a security hole for more than a year is a reason to remove > gpdf. > > evince seems to be a replacement, gpdf is deprecated. It should imho get orphaned first. BCCing the MIA people - what's up there anyway? Hasn't mecha

Re: Bug#379063: DDPO: include data about versions in Ubuntu

2006-07-21 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Alexander Wirt wrote: >> Note that the lack of a good contact information has bugged me also for bpo. > (Do you know: http://www.backports.org/~formorer/) No, I didn't. Thanks! Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: Bug#379063: DDPO: include data about versions in Ubuntu

2006-07-21 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Thomas Viehmann 2006-07-21 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Well, you (as in DDPO maintainers) have been doing a good job of > balancing clutter and information richness. As I've pointed out to Lucas > in private mail, in the end, I'd like to get two pages, one for Debian > only and one for/with Ubuntu in

Re: Bug#379063: DDPO: include data about versions in Ubuntu

2006-07-21 Thread Alexander Wirt
*snip* > Note that the lack of a good contact information has bugged me also for bpo. What is missing (except from a better website)? (Do you know: http://www.backports.org/~formorer/) Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#379063: DDPO: include data about versions in Ubuntu

2006-07-21 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Christoph Berg wrote: > My current plan is to have a list of additional distributions that is > configurable for opt-in/out, also including backports.org that is > already shown now. Ubuntu would be disabled per default, bpo probably > enabled. That way we can easily add more derivatives and still

Bug#379063: DDPO: include data about versions in Ubuntu

2006-07-21 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Thomas Viehmann 2006-07-21 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I think that the problem is that DDPO is already very heavily loaded. > While I'm not that particular to what host it is on, I'd prefer if the > non-Debian information was somewhere else but easily reached. My current plan is to have a list of a

gpdf: remove? security hole open for this long?

2006-07-21 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, I think having a security hole for more than a year is a reason to remove gpdf. evince seems to be a replacement, gpdf is deprecated. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscrib