* Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-18 18:23]:
> sfio and doxymacs have both a RC bug for more than 250 days holding
> them out of testing. They also have almost no (max 15) votes
> according to popcon.
> ... asking for removal...
OK.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSU
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-18 15:06]:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/03/msg00089.html
> I asked whether we might want to remove serpento. I'd vote for
> it but my question was ignored.
>
> Any opinions?
I suggest you ask a) the maintainer of dict b) the MIA people
Your message dated Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:19:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line package overview for any email
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:57:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line developer.php: task view support
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 11:50:22AM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> Hi there, Stefan
>
> Stefan Huehner wrote:
> > i think lintian has a check for this issue. Please look into [1] if
> > this is what you need.
> > http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tpostinst-should-not-set-usr-doc-link.html
>
> Great pointer
Juan Alvarez appears MIA; hasn't uploaded any packages or responded
to any bugs since 2003.
I've filed a removal request for ipsc. Is it OK to file a bug to
orphan his other solo-maintained package, "prips", which has no
bugs (and is quite simple)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi
sfio and doxymacs have both a RC bug for more than 250 days holding them
out of testing. They also have almost no (max 15) votes according to popcon.
If anyone object, speak up, otherwise I'll reassign the O-bugs asking
for removal...
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk
Hi,
at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/03/msg00089.html
I asked whether we might want to remove serpento. I'd vote for
it but my question was ignored.
Any opinions?
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
ti, 2006-07-18 kello 11:54 +0200, Luk Claes kirjoitti:
> Amaya wrote:
> > I guess what I also really need is to find out what packages had this
> > "ln -s" in the postinst in the past, because if they are not handling
> > the link removal upon upgrade, then users will have that link there
> > forev
Luk Claes wrote:
> Isn't this one of the use cases of piuparts?
Only if it can install an ancient version and test that the link is
removed on upgrade.
Lars?
--
ยท''`. Policy is your friend. Trust the Policy.
: :' : Love the Policy. Obey the Policy. -- Lars Wirzenius
`. `'
Stefan Huehner wrote:
> http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tpostinst-should-not-set-usr-doc-link.html
Most of the packages on this list have been already NMUed by 'yours
faithfully' :)
So I guess I need to manually inspect, basically:
gcc-h8300-hms
gmt-coast-low
libradius1-dev
libradius1
libr
Amaya wrote:
> Hi there, Stefan
>
> Stefan Huehner wrote:
>> i think lintian has a check for this issue. Please look into [1] if
>> this is what you need.
>> http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tpostinst-should-not-set-usr-doc-link.html
>
> Great pointer.
>
> I guess what I also really need is to
Hi there, Stefan
Stefan Huehner wrote:
> i think lintian has a check for this issue. Please look into [1] if
> this is what you need.
> http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tpostinst-should-not-set-usr-doc-link.html
Great pointer.
I guess what I also really need is to find out what packages had th
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 10:13:43AM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I have been working on #322762 "/usr/doc still exists (transition
> tracking bug)".
>
> I am wondering if there's any semi-automatic way to test the archive
> again (this mass-bug-filing was done on 12 Aug 2005), so that we c
Hi there!
I have been working on #322762 "/usr/doc still exists (transition
tracking bug)".
I am wondering if there's any semi-automatic way to test the archive
again (this mass-bug-filing was done on 12 Aug 2005), so that we can
make sure there are no packages installing a symlink under /usr/do
15 matches
Mail list logo
