Second follow-up to "52 packages it would be nice to remove"

Hi all, Back in May I posted a list of 52 packages that had RC bugs older than a month and very few users listed in popcon: http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/05/msg00026.html In June I gave an update: http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/06/msg00063.html and I sent out emails to most of t

Re: taking over a neglected RC-buggy package

George Danchev wrote: > Well right, but I have my reasoing for the new upstream release > described here: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/07/msg00201.html I never said newest upstream was a bad idea ;) I just didn't want an NMU, but a new maintainer :) > Sure. Anyway I prepared a -1

Re: taking over a neglected RC-buggy package

On Saturday 15 July 2006 16:22, Amaya wrote: > Hi George, > > George Danchev wrote: > > It is already done. > > I took a look at you rpackage today, and the changelog: > > * Non-maintainer upload. > * New upstream release. (Closes: #338451) > > I think if you are going to package a newer Upstr