Re: taking over a neglected RC-buggy package

2006-07-14 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 10:25 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > The maintainer was long ago reported as MIA. > > Please make ypourself the new maintainer. There is no need to to have > your name as uploader in this case. It would help if the MIA team then orphaned all his packages at once to

Re: taking over a neglected RC-buggy package

2006-07-14 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 06:31:34PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: >Advice: I've been told to consult the QA team for advice and for formal MIA >tracking. If the package is to be left in the cold, I'm ready to take it over >adding myself to Uploaders:, while the original Maintainer: will remain as i

Re: taking over a neglected RC-buggy package

2006-07-14 Thread George Danchev
On Friday 14 July 2006 21:57, Amaya wrote: > George Danchev wrote: > > Good. Let's do that as real NMU first, i.e. with Polkan as maintainer > > and let him has his last chance to respond. For the next upload I will > > add myself in Uploaders, along with keeping him in Maintainer: also. > > Great

Re: taking over a neglected RC-buggy package

2006-07-14 Thread Amaya
George Danchev wrote: > Good. Let's do that as real NMU first, i.e. with Polkan as maintainer > and let him has his last chance to respond. For the next upload I will > add myself in Uploaders, along with keeping him in Maintainer: also. Great solution. Please ping me when you are ready. -- .''

Re: taking over a neglected RC-buggy package

2006-07-14 Thread Amaya
I am also contacting the sponsor of shc too. -- .''`. Fuck your fascist beauty standards : :' : `. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subje

Re: taking over a neglected RC-buggy package

2006-07-14 Thread George Danchev
On Friday 14 July 2006 21:06, Amaya wrote: > Hi there, George (and Polkan) Hello, > George Danchev wrote: > > Advice: I've been told to consult the QA team for advice and for > > formal MIA tracking. If the package is to be left in the cold, I'm > > ready to take it over adding myself to Uplo

Re: taking over a neglected RC-buggy package

2006-07-14 Thread Amaya
Hi there, George (and Polkan) George Danchev wrote: > Advice: I've been told to consult the QA team for advice and for > formal MIA tracking. If the package is to be left in the cold, I'm > ready to take it over adding myself to Uploaders:, while the original > Maintainer: will remain as it

Re: taking over a neglected RC-buggy package

2006-07-14 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hello George, > Advice: I've been told to consult the QA team for advice and for formal > MIA > tracking. If the package is to be left in the cold, I'm ready to take it over > adding myself to Uploaders:, while the original Maintainer: will remain as it > is. Well, I'm still in the NM qu

taking over a neglected RC-buggy package

2006-07-14 Thread George Danchev
Hello QA Team, Background: shc package currently [1] in the archive has RC-issues [2], which have been resolved by a non-DD NMU [3]. No packages depend on shc package. Sponsors welcome. As you can see the last upload happend back in 21 Oct 2004. The RC has been filed 23 Oct 2005 with n

Re: Please check if these packages should be removed

2006-07-14 Thread Jason Spiro
On 2006-04-04, Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyway, since no one objected to a spring time cleaning, I'd like to > post the following list to debian-devel-announce, with a three week > deadline for adopting. Feel free to suggest stricter/more relaxed > criteria. It seems nobody has don