Re: Orphaned packages with very low popcon numbers

Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi Luk! Hi Bas > You wrote: > >> This is only the starting list, there were other criteria [1] mentioned >> already a couple of times before a package would be filed for removal! I >> don't get why that has to repeated every time again? >> >> [1]: >> (a) aren't ITAed, and

Bug#373218: PTS: wrong link to lintian page

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi link to lintian page is broken for non-ascii names. This is simmilar to bug #349712 which has been fixed by fixing one special char. My lintian link leads to http://lintian.debian.org/reports/mMichal_%C4%8C

Re: Orphaned packages with very low popcon numbers

On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 10:03:42PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 10:55:32AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: But a bulk "anything that is orphaned and has a low popcon number must be useless" is incorrect. You've made thi