Re: Hijack or remove postgis

2006-04-21 Thread alex bodnaru
hi all, the package currently in sid was installable in sid for a very little time only, untill multi-version postgresql has been introduced. ironically, it is well suitable for sarge and woody. as i have repeatedly answered previous initiatives, this package may be removed from sid. i have cre

Re: Hijack or remove postgis

2006-04-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Something has to be done about the postgis package. There are RC > > bugs on uninstallability and FTBFS as well as several functionality > > bugs and two new upstream releases and no one seems to do anything. > > The pac

Re: removing packages only in oldstable and in unstable

2006-04-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 04:12:49PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > gsnes9x This one is really only held out by a dependency (that, and some binaries on mips/m68k which never should have been uploaded); I don't think it makes sense to remove gsnes9x unless we should also remove snes9x-x. -- Steve

Need extra? (International job is now hiring...)._ALEX777

2006-04-21 Thread William
Title: Details inside(work at home)._ALEX777 Hi , meine Frau, mit der ich 5 Jahre gelebt hatte, hat mich betrogen. Dafür zeige ich ihre Aktfotos aus unserem privaten Fotoalbum. Alle sollen sie nackt sehen.

Re: Hijack or remove postgis

2006-04-21 Thread alex bodnaru
hi, there is a quite up to date package in debian gis, and there is a new sponsor (Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>). we are working to put it up soon. alex Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Something has to be done about the postgis package. There are RC bugs on > uninstallability and FTBFS as

Re: removing packages only in oldstable and in unstable

2006-04-21 Thread Andreas Barth
* Filippo Giunchedi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060421 20:49]: > On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:21:48 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060421 19:31]: > >> Andreas Barth wrote: > >> > celestia > >> > >> Would be a pity to lose this IMHO. :-( > > > > The other possibility is alway

Re: removing packages only in oldstable and in unstable

2006-04-21 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:21:48 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060421 19:31]: >> Andreas Barth wrote: >> > celestia >> >> Would be a pity to lose this IMHO. :-( > > The other possibility is always: Someone fixes it :) no uploads since october and no wnpp bug filed

Re: removing packages only in oldstable and in unstable

2006-04-21 Thread Andreas Barth
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060421 19:31]: > Andreas Barth wrote: > > celestia > > Would be a pity to lose this IMHO. :-( The other possibility is always: Someone fixes it :) Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

Re: removing packages only in oldstable and in unstable

2006-04-21 Thread Joey Hess
Andreas Barth wrote: > boot-floppies This can't be removed from unstable until oldstable has been dropped, at least if you're being pedantic about licenses -- the boot-floppy images in oldstable were built with the version of boot-floppies that's in unstable or something like that, and so removin

Re: removing packages only in oldstable and in unstable

2006-04-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 16:12 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > Hi, > > I propose to remove all packages only in oldstable and unstable, but not > in testing. These are: Based on a very quick scan of the list: [...] > bookview Build-Deps on tcl8.0-ja from the tcltk8.0-ja source package, which is also

removing packages only in oldstable and in unstable

2006-04-21 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, I propose to remove all packages only in oldstable and unstable, but not in testing. These are: projectb=> select s.source from src_associations as sa, source as s, src_associations as sa1, source as s1 where sa.suite=4 and sa1.suite=5 and sa1.source=s1.id and sa.source=s.id and s.source=s1.

Re: removing gopher

2006-04-21 Thread Michelle Konzack
Maybe you should call the Microsoft support? It is theree Operating System! Greetings Michelle Konzack Am 2006-04-14 16:36:12, schrieb vamsee krishna: > Hi, my system has gophers and i tried removing from registry later restarted > the computer and it's back again in registry. Tried deletin

Re: Hijack or remove postgis

2006-04-21 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 01:26:31PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Something has to be done about the postgis package. There are RC > > bugs on uninstallability and FTBFS as well as several functionality > > bugs and two new upstream releases