Bug#357593: PTS: New package shown as old package

2006-03-18 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 09:35:51AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 01:27:59PM +0100, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote: > > "This package is no longer part of any Debian distribution. Thus you > > won't find much information here. The old news is kept for historic > > purpose only."

Bug#357593: PTS: New package shown as old package

2006-03-18 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 01:27:59PM +0100, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: normal > > Hi, > dacco package has gone into unstable yesterday (17/3/2006), today has > been updated its pts page (http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dacco.html) > but it's shown as old package

Re: Antique RC bugs (many about licensing)

2006-03-18 Thread Matthias Klose
Nathanael Nerode writes: > Package: cpp (standard; Debian GCC Maintainers et al.) [gcc-defaults/1.30 ; > =] [add/edit comment] > 23 [ ] [NONFREE-DOC:UNMODIFIABLE] cpp: contains non-free > manpages > Package: cpp-4.0-doc (required; Debian GCC Maintainers et al.) > [gcc-4.0/4.0.2-9 ;

Bug#357593: PTS: New package shown as old package

2006-03-18 Thread Miguel Gea Milvaques
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, dacco package has gone into unstable yesterday (17/3/2006), today has been updated its pts page (http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dacco.html) but it's shown as old package, it shows: "This package is no longer part of any Debian distribution. Thus you wo

Bug#357572: DDPO: incorrect example in web documentation

2006-03-18 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: minor I believe the example on http://qa.debian.org/developer.php> is slightly wrong. It reads "subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] uploader", but the use of an email address in the subscribe field do not match the description of subscribe listed above. Either the examp