The PTS should download a list of pseudopackages so that it avoids giving
the current warning. The list is available via rsync:
Heya, could you guys please export the etc/pseudo-packages.* files via
HTTP so that the PTS can always grab the reference version of those files ?
buxy: it's available
Revised and updated version of a message I sent a while back.
This is the status of the compiler transitions.
There is nothing built with g++-2.95 (except the unavoidable
flashplugin-nonfree).
The following library packages still needs renaming for the C++ ABI change
(see http://people.debi
I went through the RC bugs which apply to etch and are older than one year.
This is a rather disturbing list, as you would expect from the age of the bugs.
In most cases I don't think you can expect the maintainers to deal with these
bugs on their own.
What are the release managers planning to do
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2006 15:36:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#356127: packages.qa.debian.org: New index.html page.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2006 15:49:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Unsubscription without confirmation is fine
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2006 14:56:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line DDPO handles package subscriptions
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2006 14:44:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Now handles removed packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2006 14:44:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Now handles removed packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> block 240829 with 356486
Bug#240829: packages.qa.debian.org: better error handling (f.e. ENOSPC) to
prevent good pages to be replaced with bogus ones
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blo
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2006 13:53:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line qa.debian.org: watch column broken, completely no results for
any package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2006 11:45:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330933: wrong MIME header in confirmation challenge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2006 11:37:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325860: PTS: Missing get parameter quoting on links
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
12 matches
Mail list logo
