On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 12:19:19AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 08:25:07PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > Is there a list of what QA activites are being done, and by whom? I've
> > heard, for example, that some people test building of packages in
> > testing to find FTBFS e
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 08:25:07PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Is there a list of what QA activites are being done, and by whom? I've
> heard, for example, that some people test building of packages in
> testing to find FTBFS errors that happen after the package has already
> entered testing, or
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
to, 2006-02-16 kello 17:47 -0200, Gustavo Franco kirjoitti:
I think someone told you already about my piupartme python code, that
is still in early stages of development but aims to run piuparts against
packages and keep track of the versions to avoid do the same thing two
to, 2006-02-16 kello 17:47 -0200, Gustavo Franco kirjoitti:
> I think someone told you already about my piupartme python code, that
> is still in early stages of development but aims to run piuparts against
> packages and keep track of the versions to avoid do the same thing two
> times. It uses a
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Is there a list of what QA activites are being done, and by whom? I've
heard, for example, that some people test building of packages in
testing to find FTBFS errors that happen after the package has already
entered testing, or to find missing build dependencies. I also know
Is there a list of what QA activites are being done, and by whom? I've
heard, for example, that some people test building of packages in
testing to find FTBFS errors that happen after the package has already
entered testing, or to find missing build dependencies. I also know that
some other people
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> PTS presently has a link:
> pygtk (source) is buggy! (1 > 0) =>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=pygtk&sev-inc=critical&sev-inc=grave&sev-inc=serious
>
> But there are no bugs listed, I think because of this bugs bug.
There
PTS presently has a link:
pygtk (source) is buggy! (1 > 0) =>
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=pygtk&sev-inc=critical&sev-inc=grave&sev-inc=serious
But there are no bugs listed, I think because of this bugs bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
8 matches
Mail list logo
