Re: Let's remove libgnome-gnorba-perl!

clone 347141 -1 reassign -1 ftp.debian.org severity -1 normal retitle -1 RM: libgnome-gnorba-perl -- RoQA; orphaned, obsolete, no rev-deps thanks On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 12:52:20AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > As a first step to a world without perl bindings for Gtk/Gnome 1.X, we > shou

Let's remove libgnome-gnorba-perl!

Heya, As a first step to a world without perl bindings for Gtk/Gnome 1.X, we should remove libgnome-gnorba-perl. No rdepends, no users, rc-buggy (xlibs-dev transition), no maintainer. Marc -- Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt 63: professionelles Arbeiten Netscape ist nicht auf

Bug#281299: marked as done (maintainer considered as comaint)

Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:04:20 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line maintainer considered as comaint has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Security bug in xlockmore

Hi Michael, this security bug in xlockmore is still present in all xlockmore versions in the archive and is open for now 190 days. In the meantime we organized a CVE number and a patch that fixes that problem. But still no reaction from you. I know that aren't MIA at all, because I have seen som

Re: international Debian work meetings in Extremadura, Spain, during 2006

It seems the only dates left now are March 22-26 and December 13-17 (see http://wiki.debian.org/WorkSessionsExtremadura). Does anyone object if I ask whether we can have the December slot for a QA meeting, or is that a terribly bad time for some core QA people? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyr

Bug#316508: marked as done (DDPO: fails for someone who exclusively co-maintains)

Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:41:32 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line DDPO: fails for someone who exclusively co-maintains has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#281299: maintainer considered as comaint

Coin, Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > as a by-product of the fix to #348810, this seems also to be fixed. > Could you please check if the listing is correct for your packages > now? I cannot test if this also fixed #281299 exactly as it was reported, as i'm no more the gnome-panel

Bug#281299: maintainer considered as comaint

Re: Marc Dequènes in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Look in here : http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?package=soya&comaint=yes > > Since i am maintainer of gnome-panel and gnome-applets, i am considered > comaintainer, as the pkg name is in blue. Hi Marc, as a by-product of the fix to #348810, this seems