Bug#347921: qa.debian.org still showing uninstallable after bin NMU

2006-01-13 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > vips and nip2 were rebuilt via a binary NMU because of an unneeded > libdps1 dependency, and the newly built packages are present in the > archive. However, they are still listed as uninstallable at > http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am > assum

Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

2006-01-13 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 07:52:50PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 01:07:36AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > >Packages with RC bugs due to the xlibs-dev transition are listed at: > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]:transition

Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

2006-01-13 Thread Marc Singer
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 01:07:36AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: > Justin Pryzby wrote: > >Packages with RC bugs due to the xlibs-dev transition are listed at: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]:transition-xlibs-dev&repeatmerged=no&tagexcl=patch#_2_2_5 > > > >I've gone and fi

Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

2006-01-13 Thread Gustavo Franco
Justin Pryzby wrote: Packages with RC bugs due to the xlibs-dev transition are listed at: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:transition-xlibs-dev&repeatmerged=no&tagexcl=patch#_2_2_5 I've gone and figured out the updated dependences necessary for ~40 of them to build. So any su

xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

2006-01-13 Thread Justin Pryzby
Packages with RC bugs due to the xlibs-dev transition are listed at: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:transition-xlibs-dev&repeatmerged=no&tagexcl=patch#_2_2_5 I've gone and figured out the updated dependences necessary for ~40 of them to build. So any sufficiently motivated QA

per porta a porata

2006-01-13 Thread marco rodriguez
salve, vorrei tanto che questa mia andrebbe nelle mani del siG, Bruno Vespa giornalista per me molto importante e inteligente, carissimo siG VESPA CHI VI SCRIVE É UN LATITANTE GIÁ ORMAI 28 MESI PER UNA COSA CHE NON DOVEVA ESISTERE FIN DALLA NASCITA DEL MONDO, E MI RIFERISCO ALLA VECCHIA OBBLICA

Bug#347921: qa.debian.org still showing uninstallable after bin NMU

2006-01-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:09:45AM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: normal > vips and nip2 were rebuilt via a binary NMU because of an unneeded > libdps1 dependency, and the newly built packages are present in the > archive. However, they are still listed as unins

Bug#347921: qa.debian.org still showing uninstallable after bin NMU

2006-01-13 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal vips and nip2 were rebuilt via a binary NMU because of an unneeded libdps1 dependency, and the newly built packages are present in the archive. However, they are still listed as uninstallable at http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am assuming that the