Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages

2005-12-20 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 03:32:42PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 08:47:44AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > Since bzr (and other arch derivates) have the benefit of NEVER forgeting > > > which chan

Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages

2005-12-20 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Hi J.! On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 08:47:44AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > Since bzr (and other arch derivates) have the benefit of NEVER forgeting > > which changesets are in a tree, I prefer them over any other distributed > > system.

Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages

2005-12-20 Thread Russ Allbery
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Russ Allbery wrote: >> This may not be the most popular opinion, particularly among fans of >> distributed VCSes (and I do understand the merits), but wrapping your >> mind around the distributed model isn't easy. I ca

Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages

2005-12-20 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 08:47:44AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Since bzr (and other arch derivates) have the benefit of NEVER forgeting > which changesets are in a tree, I prefer them over any other distributed > system. If anyone knows of other distributed system that saw the ligh

Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages

2005-12-20 Thread Alexis Sukrieh
* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : > following the last discussion at the Debian-QA meeting on Darmstadt, it > appears that the proposal called "Collaborative maintenance" is of generic > interest : > - for Debian sponsors and Debian mentors > - for QA which may use the infrastructure

Re: ubit (was: Xorg 6.9)

2005-12-20 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Russ Allbery wrote: > breakage for four months, the package has been orphaned since March, and > according to popcon very few people are using the package. > > Advice? I'd ask for its removal. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them

Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages

2005-12-20 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Russ Allbery wrote: > Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > In other words, a distributed VCS allows all parties to manage their own > > repositories equally, and the project can nominate one of them the > > "official" central repository, without impacting everyone's abili

Processed: merge

2005-12-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 344094 PTS: news broken when only one news item present Bug#344094: [Fwd: missing file packages.qa.debian.org] Changed Bug title. > severity 344094 normal Bug#344094: PTS: news broken when only one news item present Severity set to `normal'. >

Bug#344094: [Fwd: missing file packages.qa.debian.org]

2005-12-20 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
merge 344094 309927 thanks On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 18:21 -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > I noticed that the page > http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/webcpp/news/1.html does not exist. This is a known bug, see #309927. Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part