Rafal Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA, packages need orphaning

All three of his packages are in NMU versions, and all three are unchanged since the release of sarge. Last upload 2004-06-20 (asciijump), last upload of the other two packages 2002-11-25. Asciijump is uninstallable, and also has a bug (255934) with a fix reported but which is not fixed. Blackboo

RM: libtool1.4 -- RoQA; obsolete version

retitle 266387 RM: libtool1.4 -- RoQA; obsolete version reassign 266387 ftp.debian.org thanks The last package build depending on it (freeradius) recently removed the build dependency on libtool1.4, and has reached testing now. There is no reason to still keep libtool1.4 around anymore. Kurt

Re: Should we remove python-slang and woody?

IMO, just remove them. Tom Cato On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 04:31:36AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 00:28:53 +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote: > > I'm orphaning this because I don't have time/interest to fix > > it to rebuild it with slang2. The only package depending on it > > is wo

Re: [Pkg-zope-developers] Should we remove zope-cmf 1.3?

Il giorno lun, 24/10/2005 alle 05.29 +0200, Matej Vela ha scritto: > Hi, > > zope-cmf 1.3 and its reverse dependencies have been orphaned since > June [1]. They need to be updated for the cdebconf transition [2], > but they seem to be incompatible with Zope 2.7 and later (for which > zope-cmf1.4