Testing 32bit Email Broadcaster

2005-10-02 Thread Dr Ashlock
THE HOUSE OF VODDEN GROUP The website for everyone: 1. Health 2. Financial Opportunty 3. Video Business 4. Free Website http://www.houseofvodden.ws -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Candidates for removal

2005-10-02 Thread Nathanael Nerode
> > 1671 days: scandetd (0 waiting, new pkg, has RC bugs) [Bradley Alexander] > > Potential removal bug already filed by Marc Brockschmidt more than 7 days > > ago. Is it OK to reassign it to ftp.debian.org now? > Huh. I have this installed, and it does useful things for me. I'd be > willi

Re: gkdial shouldn't be removed

2005-10-02 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
Em Dom, 2005-10-02 às 18:02 +0200, Matej Vela escreveu: > "Guilherme de S. Pastore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > first, sorry for not replying to your last message. Real life sometimes > > can suck all our time and this kind of stuff... heh > > I know. :-) I guessed that. It's difficult to fin

Re: gkdial shouldn't be removed

2005-10-02 Thread Matej Vela
"Guilherme de S. Pastore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > retitle 287992 ITA: gkdial -- PPP dial-ip configuration and dialing tool > reassign 287992 wnpp > kthxbye > > Hi, > > first, sorry for not replying to your last message. Real life sometimes > can suck all our time and this kind of stuff... he

Re: Bug#280691: Removing efax

2005-10-02 Thread MJ Ray
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > There is never anything wrong with fixing some bugs and leaving others > for later. It is normally a bad idea to delay an upload that fixes > bug A just because you haven't fixed bug B yet. Many of the bugs are claimed to be fixed, but the merge and tests

Re: Bug#280691: Removing efax

2005-10-02 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As you may appreciate for a package without an upstream release for > a long time, there are a quite a few bugs to squash. Maybe I will > give up on some for now just to upload and avoid Matej's attention. There is never anything wrong with fixing some bugs an

Re: Bug#280691: Removing efax

2005-10-02 Thread Matej Vela
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Indeed. efax is better than the alternatives for many users. > > The recent emails from Matej did not reach me. I expect people to > try another route when it's so obvious that the emails weren't seen, As evidenced by your reply on August 24? And August 15 is

Re: Bug#280691: Removing efax

2005-10-02 Thread MJ Ray
Indeed. efax is better than the alternatives for many users. The recent emails from Matej did not reach me. I expect people to try another route when it's so obvious that the emails weren't seen, before calling for package removal, which should be last resort. As you may appreciate for a package