On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:18:26PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Based on #292629, is the only option for aspseek to remove it? Or could the
> libapache-mod-aspseek just package be scrapped? I haven't done thorough
> investigation yet to determine if that renders the whole thing pointless or
> not
Hi,
Based on #292629, is the only option for aspseek to remove it? Or could the
libapache-mod-aspseek just package be scrapped? I haven't done thorough
investigation yet to determine if that renders the whole thing pointless or
not though...
regards
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
retitle 323441 RM: kernel-patch-2.4-kgdb -- orphaned, RC bugs, out of date
reassign 323441 ftp.debian.org
thanks
Hi,
I think we should remove kernel-patch-2.4-kgdb because:
* It's been orphaned for 22 days
* It has had a release critical bug open for 106 days
* The patch doesn't apply to any ker
Доброе время суток!
Выучите английский язык вместе с нами!
-универсальный деловой сленг, идиомы и жаргон
-жаргон официальных деловых встреч
-финансовый сленг и жаргон
-сленг, используемый в отдельных видах спорта
-сленг, встречающийся в разговоре американских бизнесменов
-широко распр
4 matches
Mail list logo