Re: Packages descriptions review

2005-07-26 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Clément Stenac wrote: > As explained on the wiki page, a web interface has been created to > centralize all reviews. It is now working (though it still needs > improvement and reporting capabilities) and available at > http://zorglub.diwi.org/pkg-descriptions > Please play with it and report any

Is Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA?

2005-07-26 Thread Christopher Martin
Hello, Josip Rodin appears to be inactive. I've contacted him several times in recent months, and never received a reply. Moreover, a message sent to Josip over a month ago alerting him to my intention to report him MIA met with no response. The vast majority of Josip's packages have not been

Bug#301951: marked as done (developer.php: picks up wrong gpg key)

2005-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:01:11 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line developer.php show the right gpg key has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#314215: marked as done (qa.debian.org: [EMAIL PROTECTED] truncates bug titles in the owner section)

2005-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:57:29 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line developer.php does not truncate bug title anymore has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#265142: marked as done (developer.php: add a link to buildd.net in Buildd column?)

2005-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:11:24 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line developer.php provide buildd links has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#307461: marked as done (qa.debian.org: displays "GPG key id not found" for non-DD)

2005-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:59:25 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line developer.php re-displays gpg keys has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#318380: marked as done (qa.debian.org: doesn't find my GPG key)

2005-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:02:58 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line developer.php re-displays gpg keys has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

request NMU for Stephen Stafford's apt-spy package

2005-07-26 Thread Justin Pryzby
Hi, Stephen Stafford maintains apt-spy, which has RC bug #315120: "apt-spy: segfault with updated mirror list", for which I have a patch. Last we knew, he was moving to London and hoped somebody would NMU for him: http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2005/03/msg00026.html Could someone consider N

Packages descriptions review

2005-07-26 Thread Clément Stenac
Hello, Following the recent discussion about packages descriptions (see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01074.html and later), and based on Lars Wirzenius' idea, I started working on preparing a general review of all package descriptions. This of course represents quite a large am

Bug#101919: "at" package unmaintained??

2005-07-26 Thread Martin Samuelsson
Mathis Dirksen-Thedens @ 2005-07-26 (Tuesday), 15:56 (+0200) > Hi, > Ryan Murray did not answer my email which I sent some months ago, so I propose > someone helps him with his work and takes over the "at" package. Most of the > bugs are very old, and usernames longer than 8 chars are STILL NOT WOR

Re: "at" package unmaintained??

2005-07-26 Thread Philipp Kern
[Truncated unnecessary crosspost] On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 15:56 +0200, Mathis Dirksen-Thedens wrote: > Ryan Murray did not answer my email which I sent some months ago, so I propose > someone helps him with his work and takes over the "at" package. Most of the > bugs are very old, and usernames lon

Bug#295374: packages.qa.debian.org: watch/uscan is not running and/or doesn't show results

2005-07-26 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 12:51:43PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Hello, > > >> I know it doesn't work, didn't look into it yet why it doesn't work > >> though. As there is already a project running all the watch files > >> every two days[1], I plan to use that, it's not useful to have two > >> d

Bug#295374: packages.qa.debian.org: watch/uscan is not running and/or doesn't show results

2005-07-26 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hello, >> I know it doesn't work, didn't look into it yet why it doesn't work >> though. As there is already a project running all the watch files >> every two days[1], I plan to use that, it's not useful to have two >> different projects do the same. > > indeed, IIRC dehs data is already exported