Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Packages overview for Matthias Urlichs
General information for Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (click to collapse)
GPG key id not found! (key id was not found neither in the Debian keyring nor
on a public keyserver)
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 04:32:30PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> I'm still not convinced that this is really superior to just let them
> submit patches to the BTS, especially when considering the overhead of
> maintaining the repository and recording changes there. Not to give a
> false impress
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 07:46:36PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> The whole discussion is about defining what is reasonable, what are the
>> limits and how can it be made working.
> No, you're looking to set up a special infrastructure to support some
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 07:46:36PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
The whole discussion is about defining what is reasonable, what are the
limits and how can it be made working.
No, you're looking to set up a special infrastructure to support some
wacky corner cases. Why don't you just accept the
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's exactly the point of this discussion. I would probably do the
> same... so I thought that we could setup a friendly environment allowing
> a group of people to maintain those packages with the help of external
> contributors which are more inter
Le mercredi 13 juillet 2005 à 13:16 -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> I would be willing to maintain dvidvi, and a few similar random packages
> like that that I don't use personally but that have a set of users that
> want them and supply patches for them, once I get through the NM process.
> While
Le mercredi 13 juillet 2005 à 17:33 -0400, Michael Stone a écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 07:27:58PM +0200, Benjamin Bayart wrote:
> >If you think it is satisfactory, then, well, perhaps there is nothing to
> >change and I'm wrong on that. But if you think it have to be improved,
> >my propositi
Adobe Creative Suite for MAC - $59.95
Roxio Easy Media Creator 7.0 - $19.95
QuickBooks Pro Edition 2004 - $49.95
Nero Burning Rom 6.6.0.5 - $19.95
and much more. at http://replacesoft.com/?a=3331 with fr e e e bonus.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I would be willing to maintain dvidvi, and a few similar random
>> packages like that that I don't use personally but that have a set of
>> users that want them and supply patches for them, once I get
Rich Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Benjamin Bayart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> and almost each time with the right patch. But I maintain, for my own
>> use, a very large bunch of software pieces. One of those is dvidvi: I
>> use a "customised" debian package, which includes the various p
Benjamin Bayart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> and almost each time with the right patch. But I maintain, for my own
> use, a very large bunch of software pieces. One of those is dvidvi: I
> use a "customised" debian package, which includes the various patches I
> needed to make it work properly wi
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:57:33PM +0300, Radu Spineanu wrote:
> I noticed yesterday[1] that pvpgn was orphaned. If everybody is ok with
> it, i would like to adopt it.
At http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l3 you can find a guideline on how
to adopt a package.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMA
Hello
I noticed yesterday[1] that pvpgn was orphaned. If everybody is ok with
it, i would like to adopt it.
Thanks,
Radu
[1]http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2005/07/msg00747.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 3) There are about 1000 Debian developers and thousands of Debian
>>users out there.
>> 4) Not one of them has offered to maintain dvidvi, not you, not the
>>maintainers of the packages that depend o
* Kurt Roeckx:
> Hi Florian,
>
> Thanks for doing all of this, since it was rather manual work for me.
>
> Afaik, there are 3 kind of problems with zlib:
> - It's build-depending zlib, but linking staticly
> - It has it's own copy of zlib, and links staticly to it
> - It has it's own copy of the z
Hi Florian,
Thanks for doing all of this, since it was rather manual work for me.
Afaik, there are 3 kind of problems with zlib:
- It's build-depending zlib, but linking staticly
- It has it's own copy of zlib, and links staticly to it
- It has it's own copy of the zlib package (ia32-libs, amd64-
16 matches
Mail list logo
