Re: debget: relies on outdated archive structure

Hi Roderick, Are you still interested in maintaining debget? Is the patch supplied by Alexis to fix this RC bug satisfactory? FWIW, I don't think there's much point to keeping this package in the archive if no one currently finds it useful, just on the chance that someone may fix it later. Than

Re: wap-wml-tools: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper' and 'libxml-dev

Hi Fernando, Are you still interested in maintaining wap-wml-tools? This RC bug has been open for ten months now, because the source package doesn't comply with current policy. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Removing old orphaned packages?

On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 10:26:41PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > On the other hand, if we do a mass removal, we could post to d-d-a and > then it would be better to do it in one go. We could have a section > of "well selected" packages for which you need a good reason if you > want to adopt the

Heya honey,,..,,.catherine

Hi there sweety. Its of course me J Slut, from the web site place with personals. I was checking out all about you and I just wanted to say Hi you. I really hope that you look at my pictures and read about me at my internet website. Im looking sooo forward to talking to you soon cutey. Cya soon,