Re: Let's remove moria

2005-03-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-14 20:23]: > > > alone, and uploading a free version to main when it's ready, requires > > > them to make one change to the override file, instead of a removal > > > request, followed by a NEW queueing later. > > > I wish I had noticed this. Oh w

Re: Let's remove moria

2005-03-14 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-14 10:39]: > > > Removing it from non-free still doesn't hurt anything, since IIRC > > > that'll have to happen anyway when it goes to main. I don't think > > > keeping the *current* package accomplis

Re: Let's remove moria

2005-03-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-14 10:39]: > > Removing it from non-free still doesn't hurt anything, since IIRC > > that'll have to happen anyway when it goes to main. I don't think > > keeping the *current* package accomplishes anything... > > It's kinder on the ftpmasters not

Re: Let's remove moria

2005-03-14 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:21:45AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > > I don't think that the QA team should be formerly adopting non-free > > > > packages. I think our resources are best u

Re: ITH ngrep - nsandver MIA.

2005-03-14 Thread Steve Kemp
Romain Francoise writes: > I'd be glad to co-maint. I'm preparing a new upstream, and a triage of the bug reports. Once I'm ready to upload I'll add you as a co-maintainer, thanks. Steve -- pgpmxd1Q5Irmc.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: ITH ngrep - nsandver MIA.

2005-03-14 Thread Romain Francoise
Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd be equally happy if somebody else offered to comaintain, or indeed > if Nathan could come back and take it over himself. I'd be glad to co-maint. -- ,''`. : :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> `. `' http://people.debian.org/~

Re: Let's remove moria

2005-03-14 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:21:45AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > I don't think that the QA team should be formerly adopting non-free > > > packages. I think our resources are best utilised on packages in main. > > Is not Moria going

ITH ngrep - nsandver MIA.

2005-03-14 Thread Steve Kemp
I'm 99% percent certain that Nathan Sandver is missing in action, after several attempts to contact him have gone unanswered. With the ngrep package being in poor shape this is my announcing my intention to hijack it. I'd be equally happy if somebody else offered to comaintain, or inde

Re: Let's remove moria

2005-03-14 Thread Matthew Vernon
Martin Michlmayr writes: > reassign 274472 ftp.debian.org > retitle 274472 RM: moria -- RoQA, orphaned, non-free > thanks > > * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-17 16:57]: > > Still orphaned. > > > > I don't think that the QA team should be formerly adopting non-free > > packa

Re: Autor of moria changes to GPL

2005-03-14 Thread Erik Schanze
Hi Lucas! Lucas Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 03/14/2005 01:28 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-17 08:06]: > >>>I don't think that the QA team should be formerly adopting non-free > >>>packages. I think our resources are best utilised on packages in main

Re: gtkhtml is unmaintained

2005-03-14 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-04 13:31]: > > Takuo Kitame, the maintainer of gtkhtml, has not been maintaining it, > > and an upgrade has been necessary for ages to fix a known gnucash > > printing bug. He has told me that he thi