Re: Autor of moria changes to GPL

On 03/14/2005 01:28 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-17 08:06]: I don't think that the QA team should be formerly adopting non-free packages. I think our resources are best utilised on packages in main. Please wait a little. Following discussion of bug #274472

Re: Autor of moria changes to GPL (was: Let's remove moria)

* Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-17 08:06]: > > I don't think that the QA team should be formerly adopting non-free > > packages. I think our resources are best utilised on packages in main. > > > Please wait a little. > Following discussion of bug #274472 the author will change license

Re: Let's remove moria

reassign 274472 wnpp retitle 274472 O: moria -- A roguelike game with an infinite dungeon thanks * Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-14 01:21]: > Is not Moria going GPL soon, in no little part because of our requests to > the author when he found out just how much people sti

Re: Let's remove moria

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > I don't think that the QA team should be formerly adopting non-free > > packages. I think our resources are best utilised on packages in main. Is not Moria going GPL soon, in no little part because of our requests to the author when he found out jus

Re: gtkhtml is unmaintained

Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-04 13:31]: > > Takuo Kitame, the maintainer of gtkhtml, has not been maintaining it, > > and an upgrade has been necessary for ages to fix a known gnucash > > printing bug. He has told me that he thi

Re: gtkhtml is unmaintained

* Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-04 13:31]: > Takuo Kitame, the maintainer of gtkhtml, has not been maintaining it, > and an upgrade has been necessary for ages to fix a known gnucash > printing bug. He has told me that he thinks gtkhtml should be dropped > because it's been repl

Re: libnet-finger-perl, remove?

* Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-03 10:11]: > see forwarded Message. The Package has been orphaned 118 Days ago, the > last upstream release was 2001. Personally, i dont think it makes sense > to keep hit. However, if you think its still worth to do so, ill adopt > it. I see that

Re: Let's remove vrwave

reassign 279821 ftp.debian.org retitle 279821 RM: vrwave -- RoQA, orphaned, non-free, unsatisfiable build-dependencies thanks * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-03 16:51]: > I think we should remove vrwave from the archive on the grounds that: > * it's orphaned > * it's non-free > * it

Re: Let's remove moria

reassign 274472 ftp.debian.org retitle 274472 RM: moria -- RoQA, orphaned, non-free thanks * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-17 16:57]: > Still orphaned. > > I don't think that the QA team should be formerly adopting non-free > packages. I think our resources are best utilised on pack

Re: Let's remove ibcs

reassign 279770 ftp.debian.org retitle 279770 RM: ibcs -- RoQA, only works with kernel 2.0/2.2 thanks * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-17 17:02]: > > > I think ibcs is probably worth getting rid of: > > > > > > * orphaned (#279770) > > > * only really relevant for 2.0 and 2.2 kernels

Re: Offer to take over the shadow package (passwd and login binary packages)

* Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I'm afraid I have to decline. More packages would be, for me, a bit > > > too much and I have no strong motivation for xscreensaver. > > > > Just asking, since somebody would have to do it. > > Don't take this as a promise to take it over, but I'll s

Re: Offer to take over the shadow package (passwd and login binary packages)

On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 09:52:25PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >* Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>>Would you also take over xscreensaver and maybe let me co-maintain it? >> >>I'm afraid I have to decline. More packages would be, for me, a bit >>too much and I have no strong motivation

Re: Offer to take over the shadow package (passwd and login binary packages)

* Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Would you also take over xscreensaver and maybe let me co-maintain it? > > I'm afraid I have to decline. More packages would be, for me, a bit > too much and I have no strong motivation for xscreensaver. Just asking, since somebody would have to do it

Re: Offer to take over the shadow package (passwd and login binary packages)

> > I have announced in many places my intent to take over the package > > development, which I'm in fact doing since mid 2004 (with NMUs). > > Would you also take over xscreensaver and maybe let me co-maintain it? I'm afraid I have to decline. More packages would be, for me, a bit too much and

Re: Offer to take over the shadow package (passwd and login binary packages)

Le dimanche 13 mars 2005 Ã 21:52 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt a Ãcrit : > * Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Would you also take over xscreensaver and maybe let me co-maintain it? > > > > I'm afraid I have to decline. More packages would be, for me, a bit > > too much and I have no stron

Re: Offer to take over the shadow package (passwd and login binary packages)

* Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Since July 2004, I've got no news from Karl and any further attempt to > get in touch with him has been unsuccessful. Even before this, it > became quite obvious that the package is not very actively maintained. Same goes for his xscreensaver package, wh

Offer to take over the shadow package (passwd and login binary packages)

Hello folks, The shadow package is officially maintained by Karl Ramm, with assistance by Sam Hartman. It is the source package for "login" and "passwd", two important pieces of Debian base system. I have helped Karl in collecting the package translations (both debconf and programs translations)