On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 01:53:34PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> I'm collecting a few hints and patches in BTS, as well as contacting
> reports for clarifications and information. I could upload
s/reports/reporters/ :)
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:30:33PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:03:34PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > autofs needs VERY urgent cares in order to have it working properly
> > in sarge. Do you need help to adopt it currently? There are a few
> > patches a
At 12/03/04 10:56:46, Attachment Filter detected on server
CN=SDCU-MTA01/O=SDCU-MTA:
ScanMail detected websites01_kb.pif matched the Attachment Filter "Filter
Attachment by File Type > Extension name(s)" setting and took this action:
Delete.(SDCU-MTA)
in a message from debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > The chpasswd program ignores the system MD5 setting in /etc/pam.d/passwd
> > > (also tried MD5_CRYPT_ENAB in /etc/login.defs) and instead hashes all
> > > passwords with DES. In the case of compromise of /etc/shadow, this
> > > greatly increases the ease with which a
> > The chpasswd program ignores the system MD5 setting in /etc/pam.d/passwd
> > (also tried MD5_CRYPT_ENAB in /etc/login.defs) and instead hashes all
> > passwords with DES. In the case of compromise of /etc/shadow, this
> > greatly increases the ease with which attackers can crack back passwords
5 matches
Mail list logo
