Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC] Software Process Improvement in Free Software, Closing the Quality Cycle, Inventing Non-Developer-Demotivating QA/QM/SPI]

2004-11-15 Thread Thomas Schorpp
Michael Stone wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 09:06:22PM +0100, Thomas Schorpp wrote: yes, i've mailed to this list to find out whats missing, beating me up for it wont surely help ;) You're not being beaten up. If you were looking for a different reaction you should try another forum. This l

〔自動応答〕Yahoo! JAPAN へご返信いただいたお客 様へ

2004-11-15 Thread wallet-bill-ar
Yahoo! JAPAN 宛てにご返信いただいたお客様へ こちらは、Yahoo! ウォレットカスタマーサポート料金担当より皆様へご案内を お送りする送信専用のメールアドレスとなりますので、お問い合わせいただき ましても、お応えすることができません。 ご質問・お問い合わせの際には、お手数ですがお客様が受信されております こちらからのメールに記載いたしました各問い合わせフォームをご利用ください。 これからもYahoo! JAPANをよろしくお願いいたします

Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC] Software Process Improvement in Free Software, Closing the Quality Cycle, Inventing Non-Developer-Demotivating QA/QM/SPI]

2004-11-15 Thread Michael Stone
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 09:06:22PM +0100, Thomas Schorpp wrote: yes, i've mailed to this list to find out whats missing, beating me up for it wont surely help ;) You're not being beaten up. If you were looking for a different reaction you should try another forum. This list is basically focused

Re: Package status scripts

2004-11-15 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 02:58:43PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-12 15:10]: > > It was suggested on IRC that the scripts I have running from > > http://people.debian.org/~igloo/ should be moved to qa.debian.org, both > > because that's where they belong

Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC] Software Process Improvement in Free Software, Closing the Quality Cycle, Inventing Non-Developer-Demotivating QA/QM/SPI]

2004-11-15 Thread Thomas Schorpp
Hi Martin, Martin Schulze wrote: Thomas Schorpp wrote: Free software works by people simply doing things and contributing them to the community. If other people are interested, it will be picked up. Sorry, requirements for QM/SPI- projects is to assure that before start or error or failure

Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC] Software Process Improvement in Free Software, Closing the Quality Cycle, Inventing Non-Developer-Demotivating QA/QM/SPI]

2004-11-15 Thread Martin Schulze
Thomas Schorpp wrote: > >Free software works by people simply doing things and contributing > >them to the community. If other people are interested, it will be > >picked up. > > Sorry, requirements for QM/SPI- projects is to assure that before start > or error or failure risks would be too high

Re: [RFC] Software Process Improvement in Free Software, Closing the Quality Cycle, Inventing Non-Developer-Demotivating QA/QM/SPI

2004-11-15 Thread Martin Schulze
Thomas Schorpp wrote: > >How does this address Fabian's concern that there's not enough > >experience in the *Debian community. Sure, there may be many qualit > >managers with lots of experience in the companies you mentioned, but > >how does that help Debian? > > I assumed there should be many p

Re: [RFC] Software Process Improvement in Free Software, Closing the Quality Cycle, Inventing Non-Developer-Demotivating QA/QM/SPI

2004-11-15 Thread Martin Schulze
Thomas Schorpp wrote: > As I mentioned, this is subject for research. And I was on error with > ISO 9001, sorry, the old ISO SW-QM standard has been ISO 9000-3 (part > three) and some ANSI standards in U.S. and I've never seen a > SW-organisation certified with ISO 900x. The assessments and SPI > s

Re: Package status scripts

2004-11-15 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-12 15:10]: > It was suggested on IRC that the scripts I have running from > http://people.debian.org/~igloo/ should be moved to qa.debian.org, both > because that's where they belong and as a first step towards tighter > integration with the other scripts a

Re: linuxlogo and use of /etc/

2004-11-15 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 09:41:23AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote: > First of all, thanks for uploading the new linuxlogo. It's hardly new. All I did was change the maintainer. That package requires a lot of love. > As you probably know, efforts are being made to eliminate variable files > from the /e