Re: sarge /[s]bin/* binaries linked against /usr

2004-09-11 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 07:40:11PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > would be to send patches for linda/lintian to identify any such > linking in packages. This way maintainers will notice the odd linking > int their packages when they run lintian/linda before the next upload This won't be possible unf

Re: sarge /[s]bin/* binaries linked against /usr

2004-09-11 Thread Riku Voipio
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 03:27:01PM +0200, Fabrice LORRAIN wrote: > Hello, > > On an uptodate pre-sarge box, the following shows some binaries linked > with libraries under /usr. Those binaries might (didn't test) fail when > /usr is not mounted. > > Is there a policy against this ? We follow

sarge /[s]bin/* binaries linked against /usr

2004-09-11 Thread Fabrice LORRAIN
Hello, On an uptodate pre-sarge box, the following shows some binaries linked with libraries under /usr. Those binaries might (didn't test) fail when /usr is not mounted. Is there a policy against this ? Should I feel bugs ? Hmmm, /bin/lspci, /bin/setpci, /sbin/mount.smb, /sbin/mount.smbfs,