Re: doomlegacy

2004-09-04 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-09-04 Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Do you still want to maintain doomlegacy in Debian? It's currently > > in violation of Raven Corp.'s license in upstream, and has other > > release-critical problems. It also has a number

Re: doomlegacy

2004-09-04 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do you still want to maintain doomlegacy in Debian? It's currently > in violation of Raven Corp.'s license in upstream, and has other > release-critical problems. It also has a number of deficiencies, > and with better alternatives like prboom I'd sugg

Re: removal suggestion for openmosix from testing

2004-09-04 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Stephen Frost wrote: > > * Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > question about a removal from testing: > > > > > > openmosix > > > > > > It has longstanding RC bug (#232810). No direct reaction from maintainer. > > > > Actually, I was working on that al

doomlegacy

2004-09-04 Thread Robert Millan
Hi Gordon, QA people, Do you still want to maintain doomlegacy in Debian? It's currently in violation of Raven Corp.'s license in upstream, and has other release-critical problems. It also has a number of deficiencies, and with better alternatives like prboom I'd suggest removal. - doomlegacy