Re: Bug#228394: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Adding a "upstream version" column in the developer.php page would be nice)

On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 04:26:52PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:53:49 +0200 > > with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > and subject line Upstream version is now available in developer.php > > has caused the attached B

MIA: Lukasz Jachowicz ?

Hi, Josh Triplett reported on IRC that Lukasz Jachowicz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has two trivial RC bugs on two packages open for a long time now. I looked at his package status and he has an NMU on his other package: I don't have access to db.

Abwesenheitsnotiz: Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Vom 26. Juli bis am 6. August 2004 bin ich in den Ferien. Wenden Sie sich bitte in drigenden Fällen an Frau Patrizia Glauser (062 865 63 30) oder Herrn Raphael Lemblé (062 865 63 19). Vielen Dank

Bug#164416: marked as done (developer.php: include a link to wnpp bugs)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 20:38:08 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line wnpp link has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Re: Please orphan the package[s] you don't maintain anymore

* Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-23 10:44]: > Hey dude, > > could you please orphan your package if you don't plan to maintain it? Thats > the very least you can do for them. Likewise, sitescooper was not updated Hey dude, Michael said in that bug report that the bug submitter (or y

Re: developer.php getting a bit biiig

Igor Genibel wrote: > I thought about that but I'have the same impression than Andreas on > developer.php: it is very useful to have a good overview. To save some space, it should be enough to have one column related to the "watch" information: use the watch file in the package if available, els

Re: developer.php getting a bit biiig

On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 05:31:38PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: > I thought about that but I'have the same impression than Andreas on > developer.php: it is very useful to have a good overview. There's some stuff (like the buildd, pool and package page links) that while potentially useful don't ad

Re: developer.php getting a bit biiig

* Igor Genibel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040725 17:40]: > [...] some other idea: What about showing only the columns with contain more than a "-" (perhaps with some exception, as the sum of all bugs). That would also save some space, without hiding information. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.d

Re: developer.php getting a bit biiig

* Igor Genibel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040725 17:40]: > Le dimanche 25 Juillet 2004 16:47, Andreas Barth a écrit : > > I'm quite happy with developer.php showing lots of information, > > because it gives me a good overview about the packaging capabilities > > of someone. What's about being able to sel

Re: developer.php getting a bit biiig

Le dimanche 25 Juillet 2004 16:47, Andreas Barth a écrit : > * Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040725 16:40]: > > * Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-25 16:26]: > > > This is all very nice, but now I need three monitors next to each > > > other to see anything on the package overv

Re: developer.php getting a bit biiig

* Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040725 16:40]: > * Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-25 16:26]: > > This is all very nice, but now I need three monitors next to each > > other to see anything on the package overview page. Maybe this > > should be split up into several types of

Re: developer.php getting a bit biiig

* Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-25 16:26]: > This is all very nice, but now I need three monitors next to each > other to see anything on the package overview page. Maybe this > should be split up into several types of overview pages. I think the best thing would be to merge devel

Re: Bug#228394: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Adding a "upstream version" column in the developer.php page would be nice)

Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:53:49 +0200 > with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > and subject line Upstream version is now available in developer.php > has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This is all very nice, but now I need three

Bug#228394: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Adding a "upstream version" column in the developer.php page would be nice)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:53:49 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Upstream version is now available in developer.php has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#261111: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Dehs data integration in developer.wml)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:53:49 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Upstream version is now available in developer.php has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas