Re: 3ddesktop / release quality

2004-06-27 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 12:14:27AM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote: > > Are you interested in maintaining the package? > I really am ! > but I don't want to steal anybody's work !!! Feel free to adopt it if wish. Marcelo

Re: What's with a non-released version in sarge?

2004-06-27 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 12:26:30AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 08:23:40AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 03:47:18PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > [should we take that of -release?] > > > > > > * Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040

Re: What's with a non-released version in sarge?

2004-06-27 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 08:23:40AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 03:47:18PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > [should we take that of -release?] > > > > * Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040627 09:55]: > > > I can't think of a way forward here, that isn't going to make a

Re: What's with a non-released version in sarge?

2004-06-27 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 12:17:28AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 05:40:35PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm rebuilding my webserver, with sarge, because I figure it's going to > > release sooner rather than later. > > > > [rant about squirrelmail]

Re: What's with a non-released version in sarge?

2004-06-27 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 03:47:18PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > [should we take that of -release?] > > * Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040627 09:55]: > > I can't think of a way forward here, that isn't going to make a mess for a > > group of users. > > [...] > > There is already a NMU (pen

Re: What's with a non-released version in sarge?

2004-06-27 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 05:40:35PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > Hi, > > I'm rebuilding my webserver, with sarge, because I figure it's going to > release sooner rather than later. > > [rant about squirrelmail] See the BTS, what you request is already filed there, plus the status of it. The BTS

Re: 3ddesktop / release quality

2004-06-27 Thread Pierre HABOUZIT
> Are you interested in maintaining the package? I really am ! but I don't want to steal anybody's work !!! > Marcelo > > PS: I'm blindly following your M-F-T, I hope you are subscribed to -qa. I am, but was a little ... silently since my lasts mails were not .. very clever ;) -- Pierre Habo

Re: 3ddesktop / release quality

2004-06-27 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 10:42:59AM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote: > So I apologies from all my heart for the last sentences of my mail > that were - I agree - very clumsy None taken. > so if i can ask you to take a look at it ? It looks ok to me. -- Marcelo

Re: 3ddesktop / release quality

2004-06-27 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 01:23:28PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote: > I've worked on your package, here is the result : > http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/~mc/debian-qa/3ddesktop/ Anyone from the QA Team, be my guest and upload that to the archive (and please, forget the DELAYED non-sense). > *

Re: 3ddesktop / release quality

2004-06-27 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 02:51:34AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > I really don't want to seem rude, but wtf are you doing? Yeah, tbm > and I have (somewhat) agreed in a discussion on this list to tackle > this task and I really apreciate your help, it's welcome. But before > we do anything

what costs the same as a cup of coffee, but is ten times more satisfying?

2004-06-27 Thread Nita Shimmin
Generic sildenafil citrate is the active ingredient in the blue sex pill, and costs up to 70% less. It's a product that you definitely need to try atleast once. To ensure prompt delivery, we use first class mail. Ericka Ranieri http://rd.yahoo.com/Ifcima/Bnqq/Ma/*http://www.discountedgenerics.c

Bug#255920: marked as done (packages.qa.debian.org: package names should be URL-encoded)

2004-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:43:41 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#255920: packages.qa.debian.org: package names should be URL-encoded has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Re: What's with a non-released version in sarge?

2004-06-27 Thread Andreas Barth
[should we take that of -release?] * Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040627 09:55]: > I can't think of a way forward here, that isn't going to make a mess for a > group of users. > [...] There is already a NMU (pending in delayed/3-day) by Jeroem which does revert to the last stable version,

What's with a non-released version in sarge?

2004-06-27 Thread Andrew Pollock
Hi, I'm rebuilding my webserver, with sarge, because I figure it's going to release sooner rather than later. So I've got the version of SquirrelMail that's in sarge, namely 1.5.0-1, and I proceed to go and get all the various plugins that I have installed in the version I'm currently running on